Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3340764.3340787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Participants' Personality on Quantitative and Qualitative Metrics in Usability Testing

Abstract: We present the results of a usability study with 35 participants investigating the influence of personality on various metrics used in usability engineering. We conduct a task based usability test with a website integrating tasks of various difficulty and measure performance metrics like task completion rate and time on task. We also use standard questionnaire based usability metrics like the System Usability Scale. Furthermore, we gather qualitative data via open-ended questions and count the number of words … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating perceived usability in relation to personality traits, research findings are quite contradictory. Schmidt et al (2019) found no significant correlations between personality traits and perceived usability score as it was reflected upon SUS. In a data set of 323 participants, Oyibo et al (2017) found that agreeableness was the strongest predictor of usability (β 5 0.16, p < 0.01), followed by conscientiousness (β 5 0.11, p 5 0.066) at 0.1 significance level; explaining together 5% of the variation of usability, Rupp et al (2018) investigated the role of individual differences regarding trust, usability and motivational impact of wearable fitness devices.…”
Section: Personality and Perceived Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Evaluating perceived usability in relation to personality traits, research findings are quite contradictory. Schmidt et al (2019) found no significant correlations between personality traits and perceived usability score as it was reflected upon SUS. In a data set of 323 participants, Oyibo et al (2017) found that agreeableness was the strongest predictor of usability (β 5 0.16, p < 0.01), followed by conscientiousness (β 5 0.11, p 5 0.066) at 0.1 significance level; explaining together 5% of the variation of usability, Rupp et al (2018) investigated the role of individual differences regarding trust, usability and motivational impact of wearable fitness devices.…”
Section: Personality and Perceived Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Since the usability assessment is needed for various tools and media, quite a lot of measures and scales have been developed for the evaluation of usability (Hartson, Andre, & Williges, 2001;Hasibuan, Santoso, Yunita, & Rahmah, 2020;Hornbaek, 2010;Madan & Dubey, 2012). Plenty of the measures proposed and used for usability evaluation are subjective self-report scales (Friedrichs, Borojeni, Heuten, Lüdtke, & Boll, 2016;Wang, Terken, & Hu, 2014); others are behavioral metrics (Arinalhaq & Widyanti, 2019;Schmidt, Wittmann, & Wolff, 2019). That said, a review of the published usability studies by Forster, Hergeth, Naujoks, and Krems (2018) shows up until 2018 preponderance of research articles merely used self-report measures for studying usability of different systems.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Usability Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%