2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of part asymmetry on the achievable forming height in multi-pass spinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Table VIII elucidated that the number of points lie outside tolerance was 87 point from 101 point which consider a high error value or part was fail when 16 mm diameter of tool ball was used, as shown in figure (3) for the same sample 8.  The minimum error in average dimension was 1.705 as shown in Table II for sample 2 which formed under spindle speed 48 RPM, feed ratio 0.22 mm/rev, and tool ball diameter 22 mm, due to the low spindle speed, which coincide with the result by Jacopo M. Russo et al (2020) [4] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Table VIII elucidated that the number of points lie outside tolerance was 87 point from 101 point which consider a high error value or part was fail when 16 mm diameter of tool ball was used, as shown in figure (3) for the same sample 8.  The minimum error in average dimension was 1.705 as shown in Table II for sample 2 which formed under spindle speed 48 RPM, feed ratio 0.22 mm/rev, and tool ball diameter 22 mm, due to the low spindle speed, which coincide with the result by Jacopo M. Russo et al (2020) [4] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Figure (4) shows the schematic illustration of the main effect of parameters on the average error. Also, Tables (X) shows the percentage effect of each parameter on the dimensional error, of the rectangular spun part…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported higher spinning ratio for axisymmetric components than asymmetric forms. Russo et al (2020) investigated the formation of asymmetric parts of 1050-H14 aluminum alloy in a multi-pass mandrel-free spinning process by controlling the trajectory of two rollers, namely the blending and working rollers. Their study aimed to develop an algorithm of tool path generation that could be applied to all target geometries, while avoiding tearing and minimizing thinning and shape errors of the spun samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the roller path was not accurate enough without considering the roller's diameter. Russo et al [13] investigated the influence of part asymmetry on the achievable forming height in multi-pass spinning. The roller path is generated by a algorithm in the CAD software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%