2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of natural image statistics on upright orientation judgements

Emily J. A-Izzeddin,
Jason B. Mattingley,
William J. Harrison
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observers performed a task in which they rotated a small patch of an image of an outdoor scene to its upright orientation and then made confidence judgements in their orientation responses. We found that participants use internal priors about the statistical regularities of low-level visual features in natural scenes to make their perceptual judgements, replicating a recent investigation (A-Izzeddin et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Observers performed a task in which they rotated a small patch of an image of an outdoor scene to its upright orientation and then made confidence judgements in their orientation responses. We found that participants use internal priors about the statistical regularities of low-level visual features in natural scenes to make their perceptual judgements, replicating a recent investigation (A-Izzeddin et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Rather than requiring participants to learn the statistics of an arbitrary, contextual prior distribution, we used a long-term, naturalistic prior distribution that has been previously shown to affect participants' perceptual inferences: the distribution of orientation energy and phase in natural scenes. To validate this approach, in our first analysis, we confirmed a strong influence of the prior on participants' perceptual judgements as recently reported (A-Izzeddin et al, 2024).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations