2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4794-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill

Abstract: Motor imagery has been argued to affect the acquisition of motor skills. The present study examined the specificity of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill by employing a modified discrete sequence production task: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After an informative cue, a response sequence had either to be executed, imagined, or withheld. To establish learning effects, the experiment was divided into a practice phase and a test phase. In the latter phase, we compared mean response times and accurac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
36
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, better motor performance was observed for previously executed and imagined sequences as compared with unfamiliar sequences, indicating sequence-specific learning effects. These results replicate the learning effects that we found in our previous studies (Sobierajewicz et al 2016 , 2017 ). In the case of learning a sequence of movements, it is important to differentiate sequence-specific learning which is based on sequence-specific representations at the central and motor processing level (Verwey 2015 ) from sequence-aspecific learning which is more related with an improved ability to decode stimuli or familiarization with the task (e.g., keeping the fingers in a suitable posture), etc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, better motor performance was observed for previously executed and imagined sequences as compared with unfamiliar sequences, indicating sequence-specific learning effects. These results replicate the learning effects that we found in our previous studies (Sobierajewicz et al 2016 , 2017 ). In the case of learning a sequence of movements, it is important to differentiate sequence-specific learning which is based on sequence-specific representations at the central and motor processing level (Verwey 2015 ) from sequence-aspecific learning which is more related with an improved ability to decode stimuli or familiarization with the task (e.g., keeping the fingers in a suitable posture), etc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our earlier research, we were especially interested in the learning of a fine sequential motor skill by motor imagery (Sobierajewicz et al 2016 , 2017 ), which can be defined as the mental simulation of a movement without producing an overt action (Jeannerod 2001 ). A question that emerged from our studies was whether learning by motor imagery involves a cognitive and/or a motor level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of MI and targeted memory reactivation showed the largest early performance improvement, as indexed by the combined measure of speed and accuracy Sobierajewicz et al 2016 [39] HS (n = 24) 6 males and 18 females range 21 to 28 years.…”
Section: Trial Population (Patients) Intervention Data and Target Resmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Better motor learning is of great importance in the rehabilitation of patients with PD, because, besides allowing the storage and consolidation of information related to a particular motor task in long-term memory, it increases the spatial and temporal accuracy of movement. Motor planning contributes to motor rehabilitation, allowing the organized execution of a sequence of movements 26,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%