2014
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of molecular orientation on organic bulk heterojunction solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
485
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(493 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
485
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been considerable recent interest in controlling molecular orientation in organic semiconducting glasses (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Whereas one might expect all glasses to be isotropic because of their structural disorder, Yokoyama et al and other groups have shown that molecular orientation in vapor-deposited glasses can be quite anisotropic (3,4,8,9) and depend upon deposition conditions (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been considerable recent interest in controlling molecular orientation in organic semiconducting glasses (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Whereas one might expect all glasses to be isotropic because of their structural disorder, Yokoyama et al and other groups have shown that molecular orientation in vapor-deposited glasses can be quite anisotropic (3,4,8,9) and depend upon deposition conditions (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown that oriented layers can improve device lifetime (15) and charge mobility (16)(17)(18). Given the potential utility of controlling molecular orientation in device layers (4,5,7), it is desirable to understand the extent to which molecular orientation can be tuned in glasses made from a particular compound and the mechanistic origins of this effect. Anisotropic glassy solids are also of interest for applications in optics and optoelectronics (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open question is therefore whether precise morphological tuning can indeed harvest what energetically resembles a passed-up opportunity. Even in bulk heterojunctions, the device characteristics continue to be pinned by these lowest-energy configurations -despite the "traditional" picture of bulk heterojunctions suggesting the coexistence of a variety of donor-acceptor interfaces with different orientations, in-plane extensions, degrees of intermixing, and hence different energetics [202]. Nevertheless, the open-circuit voltage of bulk heterojunctions is usually on the order of 0.1 eV smaller than in the planar setup, and still correlated with a single CT energy extracted from absorption and electroluminescence.…”
Section: Vice and Virtue Of Low-energy Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39,40] The detailed processing conditions such as the amount of additive, the donor to acceptor ratio, and the thickness of the active layer were systematically optimized (Table S1−S4, Supporting Information), and the data of best device performance are summarized in Table 2. Without additive treatment, the PCEs of P1−P4 were 5.50%, 5.60%, 7.35%, and 5.27%, respectively.…”
Section: Wwwadvelectronicmatdementioning
confidence: 99%