2019
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Microaffirmations on Undergraduate Persistence in Science Career Pathways

Abstract: The present studies aimed to advance the measurement and understanding of microaffirmation kindness cues and assessed how they related to historically underrepresented (HU) and historically overrepresented (HO) undergraduate student persistence in science-related career pathways. Study 1 developed and tested the dimensionality of a new Microaffirmations Scale. Study 2 confirmed the two-factor structure of the Microaffirmations Scale and demonstrated that the scale possessed measurement invariance across HU and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microaggressions-directly or indirectly speaking negatively about student identities-can make students feel unwelcome and thus elevate stress and contribute to anxiety (Harrison and Tanner, 2018). In contrast, the use of "microaffirmations"-any nonobvious verbal or nonverbal cues to demonstrate kindness-can counteract the impact of microaggressions and promote student persistence (Estrada et al, 2019). Such microaffirmations have been suggested to lower stress in certain populations of college students, such as first-generation students (Ellis et al, 2019), perhaps by alleviating a sense of isolation that can be associated with stress and anxiety (Harrison and Tanner, 2018).…”
Section: Choose Words Carefullymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microaggressions-directly or indirectly speaking negatively about student identities-can make students feel unwelcome and thus elevate stress and contribute to anxiety (Harrison and Tanner, 2018). In contrast, the use of "microaffirmations"-any nonobvious verbal or nonverbal cues to demonstrate kindness-can counteract the impact of microaggressions and promote student persistence (Estrada et al, 2019). Such microaffirmations have been suggested to lower stress in certain populations of college students, such as first-generation students (Ellis et al, 2019), perhaps by alleviating a sense of isolation that can be associated with stress and anxiety (Harrison and Tanner, 2018).…”
Section: Choose Words Carefullymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By directly or indirectly speaking negatively about student identities, microaggresions can make students feel unwelcome and thus elevate stress and anxiety. In contrast, the use of "microaffirmations" -any non-obvious verbal or nonverbal cues to demonstrate kindness -can counteract the impact of microaggressions and promote student persistence (Estrada et al, 2019). Instructors can similarly reduce stereotype threat, i.e.…”
Section: Avoid Microaggressions Reduce Stereotype Threat and Affirmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Christians make up the majority of the American public, only a minority of Christians become academic biologists (Ecklund and Scheitle, 2007;Pew Research Center, 2009). Currently, biology education researchers who study underrepresented groups often focus on racial/ethnic identity (Eddy et al, 2015;Jordt et al, 2017;Cooper et al, 2018b;Metzger et al, 2018;Rodriguez et al, 2018;Sbeglia and Nehm, 2018;Estrada et al, 2019;Meaders et al, 2019;Theobald et al, 2020), gender identity (Eddy et al, 2014;Eddy and Brownell, 2016;Freeman et al, 2017;Cooper et al, 2018aCooper et al, , 2018Harris et al, 2019), and generation status/income (Dika and D'Amico, 2016;Jordt et al, 2017;Theobald et al, 2020;Wright et al, 2016). However, Christian students make up approximately half of undergraduate biology students nationwide (Barnes et al, 2020a), and are severely underrepresented in faculty positions in academic biology, but are rarely studied in biology education (for an exception, see Henning et al, 2019).…”
Section: Study Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%