2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2159-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat

Abstract: The great majority of the world's music is metrical, i.e., has periodic structure at multiple time scales. Does the metrical structure of a non-isochronous rhythm improve synchronization with a beat compared to synchronization with an isochronous sequence at the beat period? Beat synchronization is usually associated with auditory stimuli, but are people able to extract a beat from rhythmic visual sequences with metrical structure? We addressed these questions by presenting listeners with rhythmic patterns whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
252
7
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
20
252
7
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike single-interval mechanisms being based on absolute duration, those additional mechanisms would use the presence of a regular beat as an alternative reference frame for the timing of intervals relative to the beat. Psychophysical data from previous studies in normals support a dissociation between mechanisms for duration-based as opposed to beat-based timing of intervals and rhythmic sequences (20,21,32,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The preservation of relative timing tasks is not consistent with the idea that the cerebellum provides a single mechanism subserving both single-interval and beat-based timing; rather, the data suggest one or more mechanisms of perceptual entrainment with a regular beat that are independent of single-interval timing and can occur despite cerebellar damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Unlike single-interval mechanisms being based on absolute duration, those additional mechanisms would use the presence of a regular beat as an alternative reference frame for the timing of intervals relative to the beat. Psychophysical data from previous studies in normals support a dissociation between mechanisms for duration-based as opposed to beat-based timing of intervals and rhythmic sequences (20,21,32,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The preservation of relative timing tasks is not consistent with the idea that the cerebellum provides a single mechanism subserving both single-interval and beat-based timing; rather, the data suggest one or more mechanisms of perceptual entrainment with a regular beat that are independent of single-interval timing and can occur despite cerebellar damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has repeatedly been shown that performance on rhythmic timing and synchronization tasks are much poorer when the cues are discrete visual stimuli (e.g., flashing lights) versus discrete auditory stimuli (e.g., clicks or brief tones--for a summary see Repp 2005; see also Patel, Iversen, Chen, & Repp 2005). Similarly, flashes do not give rise to a strong sense of beat (McAuley & Henry 2010), and different brain regions have been shown to be involved with discrete visual as opposed to discrete auditory stimuli (Grahn, Henry, & McAuley 2011;Hove, Fairhurst, Kotz, & Keller 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarizing, sound seems to be an ideal synchronization device with its unique influence on human beings to drive rhythmic and metrically organized motor behaviour (Patel et al, 2005). The interaction between auditory stimuli and motor reaction becomes evident when people intuitively and often spontaneously, tap or clap to the rhythmic pattern of a musical piece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%