2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03933.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of medical students’ self-explanations on diagnostic performance

Abstract: The present study shows the beneficial influence of generating self-explanations when dealing with less familiar clinical contexts. Generating self-explanations without feedback resulted in better diagnostic performance than in the control group at 1 week after the intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This goes in line with a renewed conceptualization of the term “script” where students are supposed to go beyond the illness of the patient, but see diagnostic actions as a stereotypic process in which they learn the content of illnesses [25]. Studies investigating the interplay of cognitive actions and knowledge categories with instructional methods such as self-explanation prompts [8, 21, 26, 27] are a promising next step in the endeavour to understand and foster clinical reasoning in medical students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This goes in line with a renewed conceptualization of the term “script” where students are supposed to go beyond the illness of the patient, but see diagnostic actions as a stereotypic process in which they learn the content of illnesses [25]. Studies investigating the interplay of cognitive actions and knowledge categories with instructional methods such as self-explanation prompts [8, 21, 26, 27] are a promising next step in the endeavour to understand and foster clinical reasoning in medical students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus far only a few studies take metacognitive knowledge into account. The few available studies take into regard interventional aspects, namely reflective practice [2123]. There are many ways to assess metacognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in general, the literature on explanations indicates that generating explanations is beneficial to learning (for a review, see Lombrozo, 2006), the results presented in this paper suggest that self-explanation might have a detrimental effect on learning if the to-be-acquired knowledge and/or skills need to be integrated with automated prior knowledge. Some preliminary evidence for this suggestion was found in a recent study by Chamberland et al (2011). They studied the influence of self-explanations on medical students' learning of knowledge required to diagnose problems in familiar and less familiar clinical areas.…”
Section: Implications For Educational Psychology Researchmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This learning point may also be interpreted as how students can learn to signpost the structure and organisation of their clinical knowledge in their illness scripts. By 'encouraging case-based discussions', senior clinicians may be tacitly helping students learn to use self-explanation (Chamberland et al 2011, Chi et al 1994, identify enabling conditions (Schmidt & Mamede 2015) and practice deliberate reflection (Mamede et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Self-explanation', 'enabling conditions' and 'deliberate reflection' have been suggested to enhance students' construction of illness scripts. 'Self-explanation' involves a student explaining how a patient's signs and symptoms are related to possible diagnoses (Chamberland et al 2011, Chi et al 1994. 'Enabling conditions' refers to "knowledge of the conditions under which disease manifests" (Schmidt & Mamede 2015 p. 969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%