2009
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of mastery‐avoidance goals on performance improvement

Abstract: Two experiments focused on examining the influence of mastery-avoidance goals on performance improvement, and more specifically, on mastery-avoidance goals grounded in an intrapersonal standard. That is, herein, mastery-avoidance goals entail striving to avoid doing worse than one has done before. Both experiments demonstrated that in a multiple-trial context, mastery-avoidance goals are deleterious for performance improvement relative to mastery-approach, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
103
2
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
103
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Young adults perceived MAVO goals to be harder to attain than MAPP goals. This perception had enduring effects: the heightened goal difficulty intensified their feelings of performance pressure and, therefore, undermined their task interest, perceived competence, and performance when pursuing the MAVO goal.This pattern conceptually replicates the research on avoidance goals in general (e.g., Coats et al, 1996;Elliot & Sheldon, 1997) and for MAVO goals in particular (Van Yperen et al, 2009; for a meta-analytic review, see Baranik et al, 2010) -nearly all of which has relied on children or young adult samples.What about older adults? As hypothesized, they experienced MAVO goal pursuit quite differently.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Young adults perceived MAVO goals to be harder to attain than MAPP goals. This perception had enduring effects: the heightened goal difficulty intensified their feelings of performance pressure and, therefore, undermined their task interest, perceived competence, and performance when pursuing the MAVO goal.This pattern conceptually replicates the research on avoidance goals in general (e.g., Coats et al, 1996;Elliot & Sheldon, 1997) and for MAVO goals in particular (Van Yperen et al, 2009; for a meta-analytic review, see Baranik et al, 2010) -nearly all of which has relied on children or young adult samples.What about older adults? As hypothesized, they experienced MAVO goal pursuit quite differently.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…To date, only one published study has tested MAVO goals experimentally and used the intrapersonal type of mastery goal (Van Yperen, Elliot, & Anseel, 2009). Consistent with the survey-based research, that study found that striving to avoid a decline in performance (MAVO) caused worse performance than striving to improve (MAPP) or a no-goal control group, both for college students doing a verbal skills test and for young and middle-aged workers doing a managerial task.…”
Section: Mastery-avoidance Goal Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large body of research has provided evidence of the important link between different individual achievement goal orientations and key outcome variables, such as work performance (Janssen & Van Yperen, 2004;Payne, Youngcourt, & Beaubien, 2007;Van Yperen, Elliot, & Anseel, 2009), feedbackseeking behavior (Porter, Webb, & Gogus, 2010;VandeWalle & Cummings, 1997), and helping behavior (Chiaburu, Marinova, & Lim, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoidance goals are associated with negative outcomes, for example, performance-avoidance and masteryavoidance goals have been linked to depression 16 and low grades on examinations. 17,18 In contrast, the masteryapproach goal has been associated with deep learning, 19 high individual interest, 20 high self-regulation, 21 and willingness to cooperate. 22 Yet, to the achievement theorists' surprise, the mastery-approach goal can rarely predict high academic achievement (ie, grades).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%