“…Drug solubility is a key consideration in the development of inhaled medicines, including drug design/discovery [ 4 , 5 ], formulation [ 6 ] and toxicokinetics [ 7 ]. The importance of solubility and dissolution in predicting the pharmacokinetics of some orally inhaled drug products has been demonstrated convincingly [ 8 ] and particle-lung fluid interactions have been suggested to impact on inhaled drug delivery [ 9 ]. For example, excipients such as glycerol in licenced inhaled medicines have been shown to influence aerosol particle dissolution [ 10 , 11 ] and interactions between inhaled nanomaterials and lung fluid have been investigated [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Biorelevant fluids are required to enable meaningful in vitro experimental determinations of the biopharmaceutical properties of inhaled medicines, e.g. drug solubility, particle dissolution, cellular uptake. Our aim was to develop a biorelevant simulated lung fluid (SLF) with a well-defined composition and evidence-based directions for use. The SLF contained dipalmitoylphosphotidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol, cholesterol, albumin, IgG, transferrin and antioxidants. Freshly made SLF had pH 7.2, viscosity 1.138 × 10−3 Pa s, conductivity 14.5 mS/m, surface tension 54.9 mN/m and density 0.999 g/cm3. Colour, surface tension and conductivity were the most sensitive indicators of product deterioration. The simulant was stable for 24 h and 48 h at 37 °C and 21 °C, respectively, (in-use stability) and for 14 days when stored in a refrigerator (storage stability). To extend stability, the SLF was vacuum freeze-dried in batches to produce lyophilised powder that can be reconstituted readily when needed at the point of use. In conclusion, we have reported the composition and manufacture of a biorelevant, synthetic SLF, provided a detailed physico-chemical characterisation and recommendations for how to store and use a product that can be used to generate experimental data to provide inputs to computational models that predict drug bioavailability in the lungs.
“…Drug solubility is a key consideration in the development of inhaled medicines, including drug design/discovery [ 4 , 5 ], formulation [ 6 ] and toxicokinetics [ 7 ]. The importance of solubility and dissolution in predicting the pharmacokinetics of some orally inhaled drug products has been demonstrated convincingly [ 8 ] and particle-lung fluid interactions have been suggested to impact on inhaled drug delivery [ 9 ]. For example, excipients such as glycerol in licenced inhaled medicines have been shown to influence aerosol particle dissolution [ 10 , 11 ] and interactions between inhaled nanomaterials and lung fluid have been investigated [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Biorelevant fluids are required to enable meaningful in vitro experimental determinations of the biopharmaceutical properties of inhaled medicines, e.g. drug solubility, particle dissolution, cellular uptake. Our aim was to develop a biorelevant simulated lung fluid (SLF) with a well-defined composition and evidence-based directions for use. The SLF contained dipalmitoylphosphotidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol, cholesterol, albumin, IgG, transferrin and antioxidants. Freshly made SLF had pH 7.2, viscosity 1.138 × 10−3 Pa s, conductivity 14.5 mS/m, surface tension 54.9 mN/m and density 0.999 g/cm3. Colour, surface tension and conductivity were the most sensitive indicators of product deterioration. The simulant was stable for 24 h and 48 h at 37 °C and 21 °C, respectively, (in-use stability) and for 14 days when stored in a refrigerator (storage stability). To extend stability, the SLF was vacuum freeze-dried in batches to produce lyophilised powder that can be reconstituted readily when needed at the point of use. In conclusion, we have reported the composition and manufacture of a biorelevant, synthetic SLF, provided a detailed physico-chemical characterisation and recommendations for how to store and use a product that can be used to generate experimental data to provide inputs to computational models that predict drug bioavailability in the lungs.
“…A recent review by Das et al . speculates how lung surfactant may form different liquid crystalline phases with potential roles in defining dissolution mechanism and rate [ 42 ]. Fig.…”
PurposeTo characterise a biorelevant simulated lung fluid (SLF) based on the composition of human respiratory tract lining fluid. SLF was compared to other media which have been utilized as lung fluid simulants in terms of fluid structure, biocompatibility and performance in inhalation biopharmaceutical assays.MethodsThe structure of SLF was investigated using cryo-transmission electron microscopy, photon correlation spectroscopy and Langmuir isotherms. Biocompatibility with A549 alveolar epithelial cells was determined by MTT assay, morphometric observations and transcriptomic analysis. Biopharmaceutical applicability was evaluated by measuring the solubility and dissolution of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and fluticasone propionate (FP), in SLF.ResultsSLF exhibited a colloidal structure, possessing vesicles similar in nature to those found in lung fluid extracts. No adverse effect on A549 cells was apparent after exposure to the SLF for 24 h, although some metabolic changes were identified consistent with the change of culture medium to a more lung-like composition. The solubility and dissolution of BDP and FP in SLF were enhanced compared to Gamble’s solution.ConclusionThe SLF reported herein constitutes a biorelevant synthetic simulant which is suitable to study biopharmaceutical properties of inhalation medicines such as those being proposed for an inhaled biopharmaceutics classification system.
“…The reasons for this difference in PK between the 2 formulations remain unclear. Lung surfactant, which covers the lung epithelium, can have active roles, including drug dissolution by solubilization, diffusion, and partitioning, in drug delivery of inhaled drugs (22). Therefore, LO inhaled by nebulization would provide different conditions for the lung surfactant from the dry powder conditions, which may affect the absorption from the lung into systemic circulation and cause a delay in C max , in addition to the change in metabolic rate of LO to laninamivir.…”
A single dose of laninamivir octanoate (LO) inhaled using a dry powder inhaler (DPI) is effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. Nebulizers are an option for pediatric and elderly patients who may have difficulty in using a DPI. A single-center, open-label study was conducted to evaluate the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of laninamivir after a single nebulized administration of LO in healthy male Japanese subjects for identifying a safe and effective dosage regimen for a nebulizer. A single dose of LO (40 to 320 mg) was administered using a nebulizer, and plasma concentrations of LO and laninamivir were analyzed up to 168 h after inhalation by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Subgroups of 6 subjects each underwent bronchoalveolar lavage at specified time intervals over 4 to 168 h following a single nebulized administration of LO (160 mg), and the concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were calculated by the urea diffusion method. PK parameters were determined by noncompartment analysis. Inhaled nebulized LO was found to be safe and well tolerated up to the highest dose evaluated (320 mg). Plasma laninamivir concentrations increased almost dose proportionally. Laninamivir concentrations in ELF exceeded the 50% inhibitory concentrations for viral neuraminidase up to 168 h after the nebulized inhalation of 160 mg LO. Thus, similarly to the DPI, ELF concentration profiles of laninamivir after a single nebulized administration support its long-lasting effect against influenza virus infection. This study has been registered at JAPIC Clinical Trials Information (http://www.clinicaltrials.jp/) under registration no. JAPIC CTI-152996.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
