1991
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1991.11516119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of low light on apple fruit abscission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to more fruit retention (Table 3) in 5m x 3m due to less competition for metabolites and water which probably reduced fruit drop. These results are in accordance with those of reported by Byers et al, (1991) in apple.…”
Section: Fruit Dropsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to more fruit retention (Table 3) in 5m x 3m due to less competition for metabolites and water which probably reduced fruit drop. These results are in accordance with those of reported by Byers et al, (1991) in apple.…”
Section: Fruit Dropsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This may be due to less tree spread at close spacings which reduced the light creating the uncongenial microclimate within the tree canopy and decreased fruit retention. These findings are in accordance with those of Byers et al, (1991) who reported that apple plants which were kept in artificial shade decreased fruit retention by forming abscission layer in fruits. Jackson and Plamer (1977) also found that shading treatment significantly reduced fruit retention in apple.…”
Section: Fruit Retentionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The diameters of all fruits were measured 3 days before and just prior to the application of the shade cloth, to ensure that all fruit were growing well, and then measured again at 24 and 72 h after the treatment began. The shade treatments were applied 18 days after bloom when the largest fruit diameters averaged 12 mm and the shade was maintained on the trees for 72 h. This stage of fruit development has been shown to be the most responsive to low levels of light intensity (Byers et al 1991) and is the period of most likely carbon supply deWcits (Lakso et al 1999). After measuring diameters of the fruits on the trees at 24 and 72 h with a digital micrometer, fruits of consistent diameters and growth increments for each treatment were identiWed to limit variability in the sampled fruits.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Weld Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The herbicide, terbacil, which is a photosynthesis inhibitor, is eVective at non-lethal doses although it is not registered for commercial use (Byers et al 1990a, b). Additionally, there are environmental stresses that lead to fruit abscission at this time, especially low light levels (Byers et al 1991;Greene 2002), and high temperatures (Kondo and Takahashi 1987;Atkinson et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elimination of fruiting structures would favor light distribution and the naturally occurring return bloom (Lauri et al, 1997(Lauri et al, , 1998Wünsche and Lakso, 2000). However, lower values of light intensity increase the likelihood that apple fruits 8-30 mm in diameter will fall from the tree (Byers et al, 1991). Likewise, shading by the canopy produces diminished photosynthesis (Burnside and Bhöning, 1957;Rom, 1991), flowering (Lauri et al, 1996), fruit set (Lauri et al, 2004), fruit size (Raffo Benegas et al, 2004;Rodríguez and Raffo, 2006) and fruit coloration (Raffo Benegas et al, 2006), and increases the susceptibility to diseases during storage (Flore and Lakso, 1989).…”
Section: Research Notementioning
confidence: 99%