2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of lock-up provisions on IPO initial returns: Evidence from an emerging market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
103
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Underwriter reputation is reported to have a positive (Dimovski & Brooks, 2008;Kenourgios et al, 2007;Ammer & Ahmad-Zaluki, 2016) and negative (Jelic et al, 2001;Neuberger & Chapelle, 1983;Tong & Ahmad, 2015;Sundarasen et al, 2017) relationship with the initial return. Furthermore, studies on the lock-up period have reported a positive relationship with the initial return (Mohan & Chen, 2002;Mohd Rashid et al, 2014), while studies on auditor reputation have reported a negative relationship with the initial return (Michaely & Shaw, 1995;Khurana et al, 2017) and positive relationship with initial return (Sundarasen et al, 2017). Finally, Certo et al (2001) documented hat board reputation has a negative relationship with the initial return.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Underwriter reputation is reported to have a positive (Dimovski & Brooks, 2008;Kenourgios et al, 2007;Ammer & Ahmad-Zaluki, 2016) and negative (Jelic et al, 2001;Neuberger & Chapelle, 1983;Tong & Ahmad, 2015;Sundarasen et al, 2017) relationship with the initial return. Furthermore, studies on the lock-up period have reported a positive relationship with the initial return (Mohan & Chen, 2002;Mohd Rashid et al, 2014), while studies on auditor reputation have reported a negative relationship with the initial return (Michaely & Shaw, 1995;Khurana et al, 2017) and positive relationship with initial return (Sundarasen et al, 2017). Finally, Certo et al (2001) documented hat board reputation has a negative relationship with the initial return.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a prestigious underwriter could signal the magnitude of risk of the issuing firm to prospective investors (Logue, 1973;Rumokoy, Neupane, Chung, & Vithanage, 2017). Besides that, the lock-up period is an appropriate signal to represent the issuing firm's quality (Mohd Rashid et al, 2014). Shareholder retention ratio is also considered by investors to be a good signal to reflect the quality of issuing firm because the insiders of the issuing firm have a much clearer knowledge of their firm's future cash flows than the outside investors (Leland & Pyle, 1977;Kang, Kang, Kim, & Kim, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations