1979
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of location and extent of myocardial infarction on long-term ventricular dysrhythmia and mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1
6

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
57
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the present study provides new information from a population more representative of patients who present to emergency departments. In a troponin-naïve population, diagnoses made according to only the more sensitive ESC/ACC criteria identify patients with intermediate risks (lower than the risks in patients positive by WHO criteria), a finding that restores the expected relationship of biomarker concentrations, severity of disease, and prognosis (22,23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the present study provides new information from a population more representative of patients who present to emergency departments. In a troponin-naïve population, diagnoses made according to only the more sensitive ESC/ACC criteria identify patients with intermediate risks (lower than the risks in patients positive by WHO criteria), a finding that restores the expected relationship of biomarker concentrations, severity of disease, and prognosis (22,23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence and prognosis of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias after acute coronary occlusion are related to myocardial infarction (MI) size (1)(2)(3)(4). The transmural extent of MI has been shown to be related to probability of functional recovery after acute revascularization (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THE REASON for developing methods to assess the extent of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) arises from the hypothesis that infarct size (IS) is a major determinant of prognosis' 4 and that treatment of the ischemic injury can influence the prognosis favorably.5'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%