2010
DOI: 10.1086/656346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Local Conditions on Social Service Partnerships, Parent Involvement, and Community Engagement in Neighborhood Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship between local or neighborhood context and family-school engagement is supported by the literature. For example, neighborhood stress has been shown to negatively affect parental school involvement (Waanders, Mendez, & Downers, 2007) and the extent to which schools leverage relationships with social services agencies to encourage parent engagement seems particularly salient in schools located with “high liability zones” (Cohen-Vogel, Goldring, & Smreker, 2010). SFL experiences reflected the problems of working within low-resourced schools and how depletion of resources affects student and parent engagement and school climate; this yielded a more salient role for paraprofessionals in facilitating positive family-school connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship between local or neighborhood context and family-school engagement is supported by the literature. For example, neighborhood stress has been shown to negatively affect parental school involvement (Waanders, Mendez, & Downers, 2007) and the extent to which schools leverage relationships with social services agencies to encourage parent engagement seems particularly salient in schools located with “high liability zones” (Cohen-Vogel, Goldring, & Smreker, 2010). SFL experiences reflected the problems of working within low-resourced schools and how depletion of resources affects student and parent engagement and school climate; this yielded a more salient role for paraprofessionals in facilitating positive family-school connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation and maintenance of collaboration are influenced by social contexts that create and sustain social divisions (Lotia & Hardy, ). Schools located in urban and/or low‐income communities tend to face high social exclusion and competition due in part to insufficient human and financial resources within their community (Cohen‐Vogel, Goldring, & Smrekar, ). Consequently, these disadvantaged contexts may prevent partners from building fair relationships and coordinating collective activities through an empowering process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Suchman (1995, p. 579) notes that constituents' belief in an organization's "good character" can overcome the effects of "isolated failures, miscues, and reverses." Despite the media attention devoted nationally to achievement issues, there is evidence that the local constituencies of individual schools are more concerned about cultural and contextual connections (see Cohen-Vogel, Goldring, & Smrekar, 2010). Such legitimating issues as the following can loom large: school discipline, busride safety, teachers' grading and homework policies, the assignment of students to individual teachers, the values that parents perceive to be embodied in assigned readings, and opportunities for children to participate equally in sporting events or pageants.…”
Section: Pragmatic Legitimacy and The New Localismmentioning
confidence: 99%