1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00763.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Load Misalignment During Uniaxial Low‐cycle Fatigue Testing—i: Modelling

Abstract: A quantitative model has been proposed which predicts the extent of lifetime scatter in low-cycle fatigue due to the influence of bending caused by load misalignment. The main components of the model are the mechanism of bending, the type of extensometer used to control strain and the fatigue characteristics of the material being assessed. Three mechanisms of bending have been studied and it is F. A. KANDIL and B. F. DYWN tb = maximum bending strain tbx = bending strain at point x cbe = maximum bending strain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kandil and Dyson [8,9], by analyzing inter-laboratory low cycle fatigue datasets [10], also showed that, even if a test is performed under the stringent conditions imposed by the ASTM standard E 606-80 [11] concerning the maximum allowable bending stress in axial fatigue tests (smaller than 5%), the ratio of the reproducibility limits of the fatigue life reaches the value of six suggesting a reappraisal of the British Standard BS 7270:1990 [12] and ASTM standards E 606-80 [11] and E 1012-89 [13]. The above cited results were confirmed in a further research supported by the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kandil and Dyson [8,9], by analyzing inter-laboratory low cycle fatigue datasets [10], also showed that, even if a test is performed under the stringent conditions imposed by the ASTM standard E 606-80 [11] concerning the maximum allowable bending stress in axial fatigue tests (smaller than 5%), the ratio of the reproducibility limits of the fatigue life reaches the value of six suggesting a reappraisal of the British Standard BS 7270:1990 [12] and ASTM standards E 606-80 [11] and E 1012-89 [13]. The above cited results were confirmed in a further research supported by the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With fatigue cyclic-through-zero-testing, Kandil and Dyson [1,2] differentiate between misalignment due to ''non-reversed'' bending and ''reversed'' bending ( Figure 2). Non-reversed bending misalignment is caused by angular or lateral offset of the test piece axis with respect to the grips.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, bending strains change sign in a tension-compression cycle and therefore contribute to cyclic strain loading. Load -strain offset is believed to be more damaging to fatigue testing than angular or lateral offset [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 1 and 2 , it is remarked that low‐cycle fatigue test results are often characterized by a great repeatability, if the experimentation is performed on the same machine in the same laboratory, but in Refs. 1–3 the scatter among results coming from different laboratories is emphasized. So, in this case uncertainties in measurement have a strong impact over the consistency of results coming from different working groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%