2002
DOI: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000032070.60058.bb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Litter Size on Brain Damage Caused by Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury in the Neonatal Rat

Abstract: Hypoxic ischemia is a common cause of brain injury in the human neonate. This can be mimicked in the neonatal rat, but produces variable injury. The present study investigated the influence of litter size on the severity and variability of damage caused by hypoxic-ischemic injury in neonatal rats. Groups of 7-d-old pups from birth-sized litters (13-15 pups), or from litters culled to 10 on postnatal d 2, and 8-and 9-d-old pups from birth-sized litters, were exposed to common carotid artery occlusion and then, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental parameters were retrospectively examined to identify factors that may have accounted for this variable response. We found that the variability could not be attributed to length of time between carotid artery ligation and hypoxia or to litter size, two factors that have been suggested to influence outcome (Dwyer et al, 1988;Oakden et al, 2002). Nutritional status is another factor that may influence susceptibility to HI.…”
Section: Variable Response To Himentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental parameters were retrospectively examined to identify factors that may have accounted for this variable response. We found that the variability could not be attributed to length of time between carotid artery ligation and hypoxia or to litter size, two factors that have been suggested to influence outcome (Dwyer et al, 1988;Oakden et al, 2002). Nutritional status is another factor that may influence susceptibility to HI.…”
Section: Variable Response To Himentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These variables are most likely present in all studies of HI in the P7 rat as evidenced in the literature associated with this model (Ivacko et al, 1996; Puka‐Sundvall et al, 2000a; Oakden et al, 2002). One difference between our study and others that observed >90% of animals with injury is the severity of the insult.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These variables were taken into account as covariates in the statistical calculations without presenting a significant difference between the groups, and no correlation between these differences and the appearance of necrosis could be found. However, it is noteworthy that it has been shown that neonatal rats with heavier versus lighter body weight present more extensive post-ischemic brain damage [32] , suggesting that this parameter could influence the results despite the fact that it was included in the statistical analyses. There is also the matter of the significantly lower hemoglobin value in the saline-pretreated animals, which raises the question if nicotine-pretreated animals could have endured hypoxia for a longer time due to their higher hemoglobin values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the initial presentation of this model of HI-induced brain injury, Rice et al (2) exposed P7 rat pups to 3.5 h of hypoxia and subsequently found that Ͼ90% of animals had evidence of moderate to severe neuronal changes in the ipsilateral cortex and striatum and that 56% of animals had ipsilateral hemisphere infarctions. Other factors can also affect the degree of brain injury in this model, including carbon dioxide tension (26), energy availability (31), and litter size (23). Given the possibility that a threshold level of injury beyond which no treatment may be possible may exist, we chose a 90-min HI exposure to avoid extensive injury and thus optimize our chance of identifying subtle effects.…”
Section: Epo Protects Dopaminergic Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%