2017
DOI: 10.3390/ma10070730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Lath, Block and Prior Austenite Grain (PAG) Size on the Tensile, Creep and Fatigue Properties of Novel Maraging Steel

Abstract: The influence of martensitic microstructure and prior austenite grain (PAG) size on the mechanical properties of novel maraging steel was studied. This was achieved by looking at two different martensitic structures with PAG sizes of approximately 40 µm and 80 µm, produced by hot rolling to different reductions. Two ageing heat-treatments were considered: both heat-treatments consisted of austenisation at 960 °C, then aging at 560 °C for 5 h, but while one was rapidly cooled the other was slow cooled and then … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparing the fully recrystallized homogenized sample (30 seconds) and segregated sample (300 seconds), it can be seen that the mode and largest grains are nearly 50 pct greater in the segregated sample, and this is likely to have implications for the final product as the prior austenite grain size affects the transformed microstructure. For example, this grade of steel is used for forged automotive components where the prior austenite grain size affects the martensite packet and lath size, which in turn influence the mechanical properties [20,21] : a larger mode packet and lath size reduces the yield strength of the material, while a larger coarse (or bimodal) martensite packet and prior austenite grain size will cause large scatter in toughness. [22,23] To obtain such a distinct difference between the homogenized and segregated sample distributions after 30-seconds-hold means that a significant difference in the global Rf time for the material must be present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparing the fully recrystallized homogenized sample (30 seconds) and segregated sample (300 seconds), it can be seen that the mode and largest grains are nearly 50 pct greater in the segregated sample, and this is likely to have implications for the final product as the prior austenite grain size affects the transformed microstructure. For example, this grade of steel is used for forged automotive components where the prior austenite grain size affects the martensite packet and lath size, which in turn influence the mechanical properties [20,21] : a larger mode packet and lath size reduces the yield strength of the material, while a larger coarse (or bimodal) martensite packet and prior austenite grain size will cause large scatter in toughness. [22,23] To obtain such a distinct difference between the homogenized and segregated sample distributions after 30-seconds-hold means that a significant difference in the global Rf time for the material must be present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a material solution for low pressure turbine shaft applications in jet engines, a novel maraging steel with ultra-high strength and good resistance to creep at temperatures up to 500 °C has recently been developed [8,9]. Unlike the traditional 18Ni maraging steels that mainly utilise Ni3Ti precipitates to provide strengthening, the new alloy contains much lower amount of Ni (around 7 wt.%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest austenitisation treatment has more block boundaries than for the highest austenitisation treatment. This is probably due to the smaller PAG size, since a relationship between block and PAG sizes has been found in previous work [ 19 ]. The precipitates formed during austenitisation could act as nucleation points for martensite or may stop the progress of martensite as it forms, but there is no clear evidence for this based on these maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In previous work on this alloy, the influence of martensitic microstructure have been studied [ 19 ], and the phases and precipitation in the alloy have been studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) [ 8 ]. In a previous work a model [ 9 ] was presented to relate the precipitate volume fraction and size from small angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements with the strength of three similar alloys one of which (F1E) is the one studied in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%