2016
DOI: 10.1080/15599612.2016.1149896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of lateral forces on the cell stiffness measurement by optical tweezers vertical indentation

Abstract: We studied the lateral forces arising during the vertical indentation of the cell membrane by an optically trapped microbead, using back focal plane interferometry to determine force components in all directions. We analyzed the cell-microbead interaction and showed that indeed the force had also lateral components. Using the Hertz model, we calculated and compared the elastic moduli resulting from the total and vertical forces, showing that the differences are important and the total force should be considere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By pulling membrane tethers, OTs experiments have demonstrated that certain cell‐types exhibit lower stiffness when compared against indentation. [ 26 ] Similar experiments have demonstrated that pulling can be used to differentiate between cell types, [ 26 ] substrate‐dependent properties, [ 27 ] and drug‐dependent changes. [ 13 ] While it is hard to directly compare the viscoelastic properties of cells across different techniques, force directionality, i.e., pushing versus pulling, should also be considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By pulling membrane tethers, OTs experiments have demonstrated that certain cell‐types exhibit lower stiffness when compared against indentation. [ 26 ] Similar experiments have demonstrated that pulling can be used to differentiate between cell types, [ 26 ] substrate‐dependent properties, [ 27 ] and drug‐dependent changes. [ 13 ] While it is hard to directly compare the viscoelastic properties of cells across different techniques, force directionality, i.e., pushing versus pulling, should also be considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less emphasis has been placed on understanding the variation of viscoelastic properties as a function of force directionality. By pulling membrane tethers, optical tweezers experiments have demonstrated that certain cell-types exhibit lower stiffness when compared against indentation 26 . Similar experiments have demonstrated that pulling can be used to differentiate between cell types 26 , substrate-dependent properties 27 and drug-dependent changes 13 .…”
Section: Methodology For Force Calibration and Cell Viscoelasticity Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By pulling membrane tethers, optical tweezers experiments have demonstrated that certain cell-types exhibit lower stiffness when compared against indentation 26 . Similar experiments have demonstrated that pulling can be used to differentiate between cell types 26 , substrate-dependent properties 27 and drug-dependent changes 13 . While it is hard to directly compare the viscoelastic properties of cells across different techniques, force-directionality, ie pushing vs pulling, should also be considered.…”
Section: Methodology For Force Calibration and Cell Viscoelasticity Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While AFM can perform this task using forces typically higher than 10 pN, the great benefit of optical manipulation is that the achievable forces complete the range of AFM reaching down to even a few tenths of a pN. Optical tweezers have been applied successfully earlier to measure cells’ Young’s modulus by trapping microbeads of various diameters and pushing them against the cells in an axial direction [ 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. These cell indentation experiments use optical forces of less than 10 pN combined with a larger contact surface radius than a typical AFM tip ( r ≈ 1 μm vs. r ≈ 10 nm), which allows only small indentations, and consequently only smaller Young’s moduli can be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%