2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00382-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of laser-microgrooved implant and abutment surfaces on mean crestal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissue healing: a 3-year longitudinal randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract: Purpose The study aimed to compare clinical and radiographic parameters of peri-implant site of laser-microgrooved implants with either laser-microgrooved or regular machined prosthetic abutment post 3 years of early loading. Method Twenty edentulous sites of systemically and periodontally healthy individuals were allocated into two groups in this prospective, two-armed, randomized double-blinded clinical trial in 1:1 ratio, wherein each site rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 5 For this reason, there is increasing researches focusing on surface modification in an aim of improving gingival adhesion and sealing on the implant abutment, especially in a bionic pattern. 30 , 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 For this reason, there is increasing researches focusing on surface modification in an aim of improving gingival adhesion and sealing on the implant abutment, especially in a bionic pattern. 30 , 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such LMS-neck implants have a lower peri -implant MBL than that of machined-neck implants without micro-threads. Similarly, LMS tends to restrict CAL and favor effective attachment of the periodontal tissue, as opposed to machined micro-threads ( Ahamed et al, 2021 , Ketabi and Deporter, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical attachment level [ 16 ]: evaluated at baseline (before implant placement) and 1 year post functional loading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative position of gingival margin (R-PGM) [ 16 ]: evaluated immediately post restoration (baseline), 6 months, and 1 year post functional loading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation