2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of landmark stability on control by occasion setters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More important, despite the differences in absolute amounts of transfer obtained, Bonardi’s, Holland’s, and Rescorla’s (e.g., Rescorla, 1991a, 1991b) data fall on the same continuum: little or no transfer after training in a single occasion setting task, more (but seldom complete) transfer across targets of other occasion setters, and even after subjects are trained on multiple occasion setting tasks, little or no transfer to separately trained targets (e.g., Bonardi, 1998; Bonardi & Hall, 1994). This general pattern is found in many conditioning preparations and species (e.g., Baeyens et al, 2004; Cleland, Ruprecht, Lee, & Leising, 2017; Leising et al, 2015; Roper, Chaponis, & Blaisdell, 2005; Skinner et al, 1998).…”
Section: Content Of Learning In Occasion Settingmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More important, despite the differences in absolute amounts of transfer obtained, Bonardi’s, Holland’s, and Rescorla’s (e.g., Rescorla, 1991a, 1991b) data fall on the same continuum: little or no transfer after training in a single occasion setting task, more (but seldom complete) transfer across targets of other occasion setters, and even after subjects are trained on multiple occasion setting tasks, little or no transfer to separately trained targets (e.g., Bonardi, 1998; Bonardi & Hall, 1994). This general pattern is found in many conditioning preparations and species (e.g., Baeyens et al, 2004; Cleland, Ruprecht, Lee, & Leising, 2017; Leising et al, 2015; Roper, Chaponis, & Blaisdell, 2005; Skinner et al, 1998).…”
Section: Content Of Learning In Occasion Settingmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…More important, despite the differences in absolute amounts of transfer obtained, Bonardi's, Holland's, andRescorla's (e.g., Rescorla, 1991a, 1991b) data fall on the same continuum: little or no transfer after training in a single occasion setting task, more (but seldom complete) transfer across targets of other occasion setters, and even after subjects are trained on multiple occasion setting tasks, little or no transfer to separately trained targets (e.g., Bonardi, 1998;Bonardi & Hall, 1994). This general pattern is found in many conditioning preparations and species (e.g., Baeyens et al, 2004;Cleland, Ruprecht, Lee, & Leising, 2017;Leising et al, 2015;Roper, Chaponis, & Blaisdell, 2005;Skinner et al, 1998). Holland (1992;Lamarre & Holland, 1987) concluded that whereas training of a single occasion setting discrimination would establish modulatory links between the feature and the target-US unit (as in Figure 1B and 1D), training of multiple discriminations, with comparable treatment of multiple features and targets, might encourage a more global representation.…”
Section: Cs-and Us-specificity Of Occasion Settingmentioning
confidence: 61%