2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of ionic strength on the interaction of viruses with charged surfaces under environmental conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For MS2 phage, the measured IEP value (ϳ3.5 to 3.9) is lower than that expected if considering the capsid (IEP of Ͼ8) (10,15,19) only. As detailed previously (10), the dependence of electrophoretic mobility of MS2 phage on solution ionic strength is typical of that classically encountered for soft (i.e., permeable) particles.…”
contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…For MS2 phage, the measured IEP value (ϳ3.5 to 3.9) is lower than that expected if considering the capsid (IEP of Ͼ8) (10,15,19) only. As detailed previously (10), the dependence of electrophoretic mobility of MS2 phage on solution ionic strength is typical of that classically encountered for soft (i.e., permeable) particles.…”
contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Additional factors affecting adsorption include the different intrinsic characteristics, such as the isoelectric point, of the virus. In this experiment, the viral surrogates studied (FCV, MS2, MNV, and PRD1) may have slightly different net surface charges, as demonstrated by the different isoelectric points (4.9, 3.9, unknown [but thought to be similar to that of NoV at 5.0], and 4.2, respectively) (38,52). Even with these differences, the elution buffer with a pH of 6.5 containing 0.3 M NaCl and 0.1% Tween 80 described here was formulated to inhibit electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, thus disrupting adsorption to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works used DLS for pI determination of adenovirus type 5 (Trilisky and Lenhoff, 2007) and retrovirus (Rodrigues et al, 2008); however, this is the first report where the pI of a VLP was determined using this technique. Also, Schaldach et al (2006) determined experimentally the pI of three viruses (Norwalk, MS2, and Qb) in order to study their interaction with charged surfaces. The great advantage of light scattering is the absence of virus staining, so that their surface charge remains unaffected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%