2018
DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1520119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Interactions with Dogs on Affect, Anxiety, and Arousal in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have found that short-term, unstructured interactions with a therapy dog can significantly reduce self-reported anxiety and distress levels [e.g., (18)]. For example, children with their pet dog or a therapy dog present during a stressful task exhibit lower perceived stress and more positive affect compared to when alone (19), when a parent was present (20), or when a stuffed dog was present (21). In addition to psychological mechanisms, there are social and biological mechanisms at play as well.…”
Section: Psychological Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have found that short-term, unstructured interactions with a therapy dog can significantly reduce self-reported anxiety and distress levels [e.g., (18)]. For example, children with their pet dog or a therapy dog present during a stressful task exhibit lower perceived stress and more positive affect compared to when alone (19), when a parent was present (20), or when a stuffed dog was present (21). In addition to psychological mechanisms, there are social and biological mechanisms at play as well.…”
Section: Psychological Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent randomized controlled trial similarly found that interacting with a therapy dog, for 20 min, two times per week, over a 4-week period resulted in reduced cortisol (basal and diurnal measurement) among typically developing and special needs school children compared to the same duration and length of delivery for a yoga relaxation or a classroom as usual control group (61). However, it is of note that many methodologically rigorous studies have not found significant effects of interacting with a dog on physiological parameters, including salivary cortisol (21,62,63). A recent review of salivary bioscience research in human-animal interaction concluded that significant variation exists with regards to sampling paradigms, storage and assaying methods, and analytic strategies, contributing to variation in findings across the field (57).…”
Section: Biological Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an ever-growing reliance on methods perceived to be more valid and objective to assess the changes caused by animal interactions. Measurable physiological assessments, like oxytocin (looking for an increase) and cortisol (looking for a decrease), are becoming almost standard methods to assess stress in both humans and therapeutic animals [53,54,55,56,57,58]. In addition, there are a growing number of studies that assess stress and other aspects of autism using facial recognition, which does not require touching the subject [59,60,61].…”
Section: The Need For Research and Evidence: Connecting The Dots Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular public interest in light of the rapidly increasing presence of dogs in hospitals, schools, and therapeutic contexts (Barker & Wolen, 2008;Friedmann & Son, 2009;Hosey & Melfi, 2014). These interactions between individuals and unfamiliar dogs can evoke positive mood (Beetz et al, 2012;Crossman et al, 2020) and mitigate behavioral and physiological responses to stress (Odendaal & Meintjes, 2003;Lass-Hennemann et al, 2014;Barker et al, 2016;Fiocco & Hunse, 2017;Ein et al, 2018). However, these effects are not always present (Barker et al, 2003;Maujean et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim in the present study was to examine the influence of human-animal interactions on affect and cognitive performance in adults using established methods from the adjacent exposure to nature literature. In Experiment 1, we sought to replicate positive affective effects of HAIs observed in previous research (Beetz et al, 2012;Thelwell, 2019;Crossman et al, 2020) and test whether HAI induces restorative effects on cognition using tasks used in the experience in nature literature (e.g., Berman et al, 2008). We selected tests of cognitive performance used in the nature exposure literature to capture the attentional control and working memory components of directed attention and also a long-term memory task to assess cognitive performance outside of directed attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%