2011
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.585996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of interaction with forest on cognitive function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies report a positive relationship between exposure to GI and attention capacity measured through a variety of attention tasks such as the Trail Maker Tests, Operation Span Task, Change Detection, and Attention Network Tasks [33][34][35]. Viewing a GI video has also been shown to significantly help office workers respond to visual stimulants, such as pressing a button when a dot appears on screen, more quickly [18].…”
Section: Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four studies report a positive relationship between exposure to GI and attention capacity measured through a variety of attention tasks such as the Trail Maker Tests, Operation Span Task, Change Detection, and Attention Network Tasks [33][34][35]. Viewing a GI video has also been shown to significantly help office workers respond to visual stimulants, such as pressing a button when a dot appears on screen, more quickly [18].…”
Section: Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These green spaces included city parks [32,33,52,80] and urban forests [34]. Most of the studies were experimental and compared the effects of walking in green spaces and urban spaces on health outcomes [32][33][34]80]. One study was a field experiment investigating the effects before and after a walk in a park [52].…”
Section: Walks In Green Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies involved actual exposure to nature: either through active engagement (walking, running, or other activities) 2012;Bodin and Hartig 2003;Cimprich and Ronis 2003;Hartig et al 1996;Hartig, Mang, and Evans 1991;Johansson, Hartig, and Staats 2011;Mayer et al 2009;Perkins, Searight, and Ratwik 2011;Shin et al 2011;Stark 2003;Taylor and Kuo 2009;van den Berg and van den Berg 2011;Wu et al 2008) or passive engagement (resting outside or living with a view) (Kuo 2001;Ottosson and Grahn 2005;Rich 2008;Taylor, Kuo, and Sullivan 2002;Tennessen and Cimprich 1995). Other investigations involved virtual exposure to nature; this was exclusively passive engagement (watching video or viewing images) Berto 2005;Chen, Lai, and Wu 2011;Hartig et al 1996;Laumann, Gärling, and Stormark 2003;Rich 2008;van den Berg, Koole, and van der Wulp 2003).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study designs included 16 randomized controlled trials (RCT) from 12 articles (Berto 2005;Chen, Lai, and Wu 2011;Cimprich and Ronis 2003;Hartig et al 1996;2003;Hartig, Mang, and Evans 1991;Laumann, Gärling, and Stormark 2003;Mayer et al 2009;Perkins, Searight, and Ratwik 2011;Rich 2008;Stark 2003; van den Berg, Koole, and van der Wulp 2003); 7 randomized crossover trials from 6 articles 2012;Bodin and Hartig 2003;Johansson, Hartig, and Staats 2011;Shin et al 2011;Taylor and Kuo 2009); 3 natural experiments (Kuo 2001;Taylor, Kuo, and Sullivan 2002;Tennessen and Cimprich 1995); 3 nonrandomized controlled trials (Berto 2005;Hartig, Mang, and Evans 1991;Wu et al 2008); and 2 nonrandomized crossover trials (Ottosson and Grahn 2005;van den Berg and van den Berg 2011).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation