2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-009-9134-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Institutional Retention Climates on Student Persistence to Degree Completion: A Multilevel Approach

Abstract: Using multi-institutional data from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program's (CIRP) annual survey of entering freshmen, the Higher Education Research Institute's (HERI) Faculty Surveys, campus registrars' offices, and IPEDS data, we evaluated the extent to which peer institutional retention climates and faculty perceived campus climates influenced individual 6-year retention rates. We used hierarchical generalized linear models (HGLM) to examine the extent to which institutional climate (as measured by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To do otherwise would be to encourage regressive diversity policies. Financial aid, approaches to student advising, student employment, whether a student lives on campus, student and faculty engagement, and a host of other factors impact college graduation rates and are, to a greater or lesser extent, within the control of state policymakers and institutional leaders and faculty (e.g., DeAngelo et al, 2011;Kuh et al, 2011;Oseguera, 2005;Oseguera & Rhee, 2009;Scott, Bailey & Kienzl, 2006;Spradlin et al, 2010;Tinto, 2012;Titus, 2006aTitus, , 2006bZiskin, Hossler & Kim, 2009). Based on the results presented here, attention to student graduation rates is likely to yield higher dividends in institutional ROI than would attempts at increasing institutional reputation and other common indicators of institutional quality.…”
Section: Implications For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do otherwise would be to encourage regressive diversity policies. Financial aid, approaches to student advising, student employment, whether a student lives on campus, student and faculty engagement, and a host of other factors impact college graduation rates and are, to a greater or lesser extent, within the control of state policymakers and institutional leaders and faculty (e.g., DeAngelo et al, 2011;Kuh et al, 2011;Oseguera, 2005;Oseguera & Rhee, 2009;Scott, Bailey & Kienzl, 2006;Spradlin et al, 2010;Tinto, 2012;Titus, 2006aTitus, , 2006bZiskin, Hossler & Kim, 2009). Based on the results presented here, attention to student graduation rates is likely to yield higher dividends in institutional ROI than would attempts at increasing institutional reputation and other common indicators of institutional quality.…”
Section: Implications For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work distinguishes between simply earning a college degree and maximizing the full potential of that experience while enrolled. The constructs Scheiner identifies are rooted in the early work of Tinto and the retention literature (Bean 2005;Dey and Astin 1993;Oseguera and Rhee 2009;Seidman 2005;Singell 2010) but they emphasize the psychosocial predictors of student develop a formal conceptualization of the role institutions play in facilitating student thriving.…”
Section: Towards a Multi-dimensional Concept Of Thrivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 57% of the Hispanic high school students expect to receive a bachelor's degree or higher, as compared to 67% Black, 71% White, and 80% Asian students. Oseguera & Rhee, 2009). It is also important to explore the possibilities of intervention programs aiming to identify at-risk students and provide effective strategies to help students stay in college.…”
Section: Graduation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as motivation, interests, and career aspiration are malleable traits and the enhancement of these traits among at-risk students should be incorporated into the intervention programs. At the institutional level, an institution's size, control, selectivity, expenditure, and financial aid can also contribute to students' degree completion (Oseguera & Rhee, 2009;Oseguera, 2005Oseguera, -2006. Examination of educational expectations by gender unveils some interesting findings.…”
Section: Graduation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%