2010
DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2010.520329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of individualism and uncertainty avoidance on per capita gambling turnover

Abstract: This exploratory study examined the effect of culture on per capita gross casino and lottery gambling turnover in a country-level analysis. Employing Hofstede's individualism and uncertainty avoidance, this study found that culture could provide some explanations why international gaming jurisdictions differed in their per capita gambling turnover. Individualism was found to be positively correlated with per capita casino gambling turnover, while uncertainty avoidance was negatively correlated with per capita … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uncertainty avoidance refers to the degree to which ambiguous and uncertain situations are threatening to individuals, to which predicted ordered are preferred (House et al , 2004). People who live in societies with high-uncertainty avoidance prefer to take fewer risks (Parboteeah et al , 2005), trust in others (Hwang, 2009) and are likely to feel more uncomfortable in unknown or surprising situations (Ozorio et al , 2010), in comparison to those who live in low-uncertainty avoidance societies (House et al , 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty avoidance refers to the degree to which ambiguous and uncertain situations are threatening to individuals, to which predicted ordered are preferred (House et al , 2004). People who live in societies with high-uncertainty avoidance prefer to take fewer risks (Parboteeah et al , 2005), trust in others (Hwang, 2009) and are likely to feel more uncomfortable in unknown or surprising situations (Ozorio et al , 2010), in comparison to those who live in low-uncertainty avoidance societies (House et al , 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%