2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of indenter-surface misalignment on the results of instrumented indentation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction for tip-sample misalignment was performed using a specially designed alignment tool. For details on the experimental technique see; [30,38] and for the alignment tool see. [38] Tensile tests were performed on a Zwick Z010 universal tensile tester at a room temperature of 23 8C.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correction for tip-sample misalignment was performed using a specially designed alignment tool. For details on the experimental technique see; [30,38] and for the alignment tool see. [38] Tensile tests were performed on a Zwick Z010 universal tensile tester at a room temperature of 23 8C.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details on the experimental technique see; [30,38] and for the alignment tool see. [38] Tensile tests were performed on a Zwick Z010 universal tensile tester at a room temperature of 23 8C. Experiments were performed by applying constant linear strain rates _ " ¼ _ x=l 0 ð Þor engineering stresses s ¼ F=A 0 ð Þ .…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), E can be derived in a way that circumvents some of the problems mentioned above. [35] The advantages of this probe geometry include that the contact area is constant and independent of the indentation depth, no assumptions on the contact perimeter are required and, initially, Figure 1. Load-displacement response obtained upon indenting polystyrene with a Berkovich indenter, showing the fit applied in the Oliver and Pharr method to obtain the slope S at the onset of the unloading step as well as the contact depth h c .…”
Section: Progress Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plasticity is negligible. [35] Unfortunately, that geometry is very sensitive to tip-sample misalignment: 18 misalignment results in approximately 10% difference in E. It is possible to minimize the misalignment. [35] However, performing an alignment procedure for all members of the HTE library is time-consuming and is therefore not HTE-compatible.…”
Section: Progress Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was solved by sample re-alignment using a specially designed alignment tool. Details on the alignment procedure can be found elsewhere [59]. The geometry of the tip was characterized using SEM and AFM and proved to have a tipdiameter of 10 µm (Figure (5a)), a top angle of 72 º (see Figure (5b)), and an edge radius of 1 µm (Figure (5c)).…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%