2020
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of human resource practices on perceived work ability and the preferred retirement age: A latent growth modelling approach

Abstract: Organisations are challenged to extend working lives of older workers. However, there is little empirical evidence available on how organisations should do this. This study aims to fill this gap by testing the effect of Human Resource (HR) practices on perceived work ability and the preferred retirement age. Based on the Conversation of Resources theory, we expected that the use of HR practices has a positive effect on perceived work ability and preferred retirement age. We have conducted latent growth curve m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Above all, future research should expand and advance our current knowledge on the topic by investigating the relationships between the contextual, organizational, and individual level of conversion factors [ 8 ] and SE. For instance, exploring whether implementing high-involvement Human Resource Management practices [ 41 ] and creating a supportive leadership culture [ 42 ] at the workplace can enhance a worker’s sustainable employability is the next course of action, which will be our upcoming research endeavor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above all, future research should expand and advance our current knowledge on the topic by investigating the relationships between the contextual, organizational, and individual level of conversion factors [ 8 ] and SE. For instance, exploring whether implementing high-involvement Human Resource Management practices [ 41 ] and creating a supportive leadership culture [ 42 ] at the workplace can enhance a worker’s sustainable employability is the next course of action, which will be our upcoming research endeavor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, more fine-grained conceptualizations of such practices were proposed as well (e.g., a classification into accommodative, maintenance, utilization, and development HR bundles for older employees; Kooij et al, 2014). Only recently, Pak et al (2020) showed in a sample of more than 12,000 employees that developmental practices seem to have the most desirable effects on work ability and preferred retirement age while maintenance, accommodative, and utilization practices were negatively related with work ability. This more negative view of maintenance practices is also echoed by Veth et al (2019) who found that maintenance practices were negatively associated with outcomes such as work engagement, independently of employees' age.…”
Section: Maintenance Versus Development Hrm Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work on scale development and the resulting LLWI together with the use of further established scales (e.g., for age-inclusive HR-practices; Boehm et al, 2014) might be of value here. Furthermore, as Pak et al (2020) note, clearly specified theoretical frameworks should be used and tested to explain the effects of age-related HRM at the various levels of analysis (e.g., the COR, JD-R, SOC, SST, or AMO-frameworks). Finally, strong empirical designs should be employed to investigate if age-related HRM really has a causal effect on the intended outcomes such as performance, health, and late retirement.…”
Section: Fu Ture Rese Arch Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated above, we argue that perceived HR practices can help individuals gain additional personal and job resources or reduce strain on personal and job resources and therefore help start a resource gain cycle. Previous research has shown that HR practices as offered by line managers and perceived by employees are beneficial for outcomes related to sustainable careers (Pak et al, 2019;Pak et al, 2020;Veth et al, 2016), and we argue that they might be especially relevant in combatting career shocks that threaten the ability, motivation and opportunity to continue working. However, we do not yet have a clear picture which practices are most beneficial for which indicator of sustainable careers and under which circumstances.…”
Section: Hr Practicesmentioning
confidence: 67%