The influence of high-intensity exercise training on the Wlim-Tlim relationship

Jenkins, David G.; Quigley, Brian M.

doi:10.1249/00005768-199302000-00019

Cited by 77 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Not all conditions, however, have been investigated in terms of effects on _ w cr . In any case, and coherently with the principles pointed out here above, it has been demonstrated that both continuous (Heubert et al 2003;Jenkins and Quigley 1992) and high-intensity interval training (Gaesser and Wilson 1988;Jenkins and Quigley 1993;Kendall et al 2009;Poole et al 1990;Vanhatalo et al 2008) increase _ w cr . Moreover, strength training was shown to increase the time to exhaustion during high-intensity exercise by an effect on W′ without changes of _ w cr (Sawyer et al 2014).…”

Section: Abbreviations and Symbolssupporting

confidence: 79%

Energetics of Muscular Exercise

Ferretti¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Abbreviations and Symbolssupporting

confidence: 79%

Energetics of Muscular Exercise

Ferretti¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Consistent with this notion, however, is evidence that an increased W ? brought about by a period of highintensity interval training enables a prolongation of the time to fatigue at a fixed supra-critical power output (Jenkins & Quigley, 1993). …”

Section: Responses To Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although it is true that interventions such as creatine loading, glycogen depletion, and endurance or high-intensity interval training have predictable effects on the parameters of the power Áduration relationship (Jenkins & Quigley, 1992, 1993Miura et al ., 1999Miura et al ., , 2000Poole et al ., 1990), it is much harder to explain the influence of prior exercise and pacing on W ? if one accepts the assumption that W ?…”

Section: Practical Implications and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance

Burnley

Jones

2007

European Journal of Sport Science

330

339

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is well known that physiological variables such as maximal oxygen uptake (V O 2max ), exercise economy, the lactate threshold, and critical power are highly correlated with endurance exercise performance. In this review, we explore the basis for these relationships by explaining the influence of these ''traditional'' variables on the dynamic profiles of the V O 2 response to exercise of different intensities, and how these differences in V O 2 dynamics are related to exercise tolerance and fatigue. The existence of a ''slow component'' of V O 2 during exercise above the lactate threshold reduces exercise efficiency and mandates a greater consumption of endogenous fuel stores (chiefly muscle glycogen) for muscle respiration. For higher exercise intensities (above critical power), steady states in blood acid Ábase status and pulmonary gas exchange are not attainable and V O 2 will increase with time until V O 2max is reached. Here, we show that it is the interaction of the V O 2 slow component, V O 2max , and the ''anaerobic capacity'' that determines the exercise tolerance. Essentially, we take the view that an appreciation of the various exercise intensity ''domains'' and their characteristic effects on V O 2 dynamics can be helpful in improving our understanding of the determinants of exercise tolerance and the limitations to endurance sports performance. The reciprocal effects of interventions such as training, prior exercise, and manipulations of muscle oxygen availability on aspects of V O 2 kinetics and exercise tolerance are consistent with this view.

show abstract

“…The CP test can be used to predict both anaerobic and aerobic exercise performance (15,27,28,36,38,43,45). The AWC has been correlated with maximal oxygen deficit (19) and work performed in a 30 s all-out cycle ergometer test (36,43).…”

Section: Thus P(t Lim ) = Awc + Cp(t Lim ) and T Lim = Awc/(p -Cp) (mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, AWC provides a measure of anaerobic capabilities used to predict performance in power and sprint events (28). Alternatively, CP has been used to predict endurance capability (15,27,38,45).…”

Section: Thus P(t Lim ) = Awc + Cp(t Lim ) and T Lim = Awc/(p -Cp) (mentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Single Work Bout Test to Estimate Critical Power and Anaerobic Work Capacity

Bergstrom

Housh

Zúñiga

et al. 2012

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to develop a new 3-min, single workbout test to estimate critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC) using the Monark cycle ergometer with the resistance based on the individual's body weight.Twelve moderately-trained adults (6 men and 6 women; mean age ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.5 yr)performed an incremental cycle ergometer test to exhaustion. The CP and AWC were estimated from the original work limit (W lim ) versus time limit (T lim ) relationship (CP PT ) and a 3-min all-out test (CP 3min ) against a fixed resistance and compared to CP and AWC estimated from the new 3-min tests on the Monark cycle ergometer (CP 3.5% and CP 4.5% ).The resistance values for the CP 3.5% and CP 4.5% tests were set at 3.5% and 4.5% of the subject's body weight (kg). The Mean differences between estimates of CP and AWC derived from the four methods (CP PT , CP 3min , CP 3.5% and CP 4.5% ) were analyzed using separate one-way repeated measures ANOVAs with paired t-tests and Bonferroni corrections for post-hoc comparisons. The relationships among the four estimates of CP and AWC were described using Pearson product-moment correlations and separate zeroorder correlation matrices. The results indicated that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) among mean CP values for CP PT (178 ± 47 W), CP 3.5% (173 ± 40 W), and CP 4.5% (186 ± 44 W). The mean CP 3min (193 ± 54 W), however, was significantly greater than CP PT and CP 3.5% . There were no significant differences in AWC for the CP PT (13412 ± 6247 J), CP 3min (10895 ± 2923 J), and CP 4.5% (9842 ± 4394 J). The AWC values for the CP PT and CP 3min , however, were significantly greater than CP 3.5% (8357 ± 2946J). The results of the present study indicated that CP and AWC could be estimated from a single 3-min workbout test on the Monark cycle ergometer with the resistance set at 4.5% of body weight. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

show abstract

The influence of high-intensity exercise training on the Wlim-Tlim relationship

Cited by 77 publications

References 0 publications

Energetics of Muscular Exercise

Energetics of Muscular Exercise

Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance

A New Single Work Bout Test to Estimate Critical Power and Anaerobic Work Capacity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About