2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijram.2006.009537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of hazard models on GIS-based regional risk assessments and mitigation policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the planning phase, databases can be populated with information that can include land use models integrating earth science and socioeconomic information by locality (Bernknopf and Rabinovici 2006). Wood and Good (2004) reported on experience with a GIS to assess the vulnerability of an Oregon port to earthquake and tsunami risk.…”
Section: Earthquake Risk Management Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the planning phase, databases can be populated with information that can include land use models integrating earth science and socioeconomic information by locality (Bernknopf and Rabinovici 2006). Wood and Good (2004) reported on experience with a GIS to assess the vulnerability of an Oregon port to earthquake and tsunami risk.…”
Section: Earthquake Risk Management Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LUPM integrates natural-hazards, earth-science, and economic information in a Geographic Information System (GIS) to estimate expected value and uncertainty of return-on-investment, expected loss, and expected value and uncertainty of community wealth retained. For a natural-hazard event, a user can run the LUPM to evaluate the risks and returns of investing in different portfolios of locations and loss-mitigation strategies, and then compare and rank them according to the user's risk preferences (Bernknopf and others, 2006;Dinitz and others, 2003). The LUPM was designed for decision-making at a regional-level, but data at any scale can be entered into the model.…”
Section: The Land Use Portfolio Model Risk-analysis Tool Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%