2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of giant fibres on utility for production of massaged products of porcine muscle longissimus dorsi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, with the compression plate used in our study, the hardness of crayfish meat measured was 31 N. In studies by other authors, in which penetration shafts were used, hardness was 4.8 N in common carp [100], 25.2 N in common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) [101], 27.7 N in roe deer (Capreolus preolus), and 47 N in wild boar (Sus scrofa) [102]. A much greater hardness was shown for pig (56 to 100 N) [103,104] and cattle meat (30.5 to 68.7 N) [105]. In turn, Hamre et al [106], using a compression test at lower deformation values than in our study (60% vs. 80%), reported the hardness of Atlantic salmon fillets at 5.8 N.…”
Section: Culinary Properties Of Spiny-cheek Crayfish Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, with the compression plate used in our study, the hardness of crayfish meat measured was 31 N. In studies by other authors, in which penetration shafts were used, hardness was 4.8 N in common carp [100], 25.2 N in common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) [101], 27.7 N in roe deer (Capreolus preolus), and 47 N in wild boar (Sus scrofa) [102]. A much greater hardness was shown for pig (56 to 100 N) [103,104] and cattle meat (30.5 to 68.7 N) [105]. In turn, Hamre et al [106], using a compression test at lower deformation values than in our study (60% vs. 80%), reported the hardness of Atlantic salmon fillets at 5.8 N.…”
Section: Culinary Properties Of Spiny-cheek Crayfish Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the CSA of muscle fibres in F. limosus (85.04 µm 2 ) is four times smaller than that in horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus-484 µm 2 [114]. Even greater differences in fibre size were observed when comparing crayfish meat to that of various fish species-sea bass [115], common carp [100], tench [116], as well as livestock-pork [103,104], beef [117], chicken [118], and duck [119]. Some of the most important sensory properties of the meat of aquatic animals are the intensive odour and flavour (fishy, seaweed), which depend particularly on storage conditions [120].…”
Section: Culinary Properties Of Spiny-cheek Crayfish Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number and size of muscle fibers to a large degree are associated with meat quality [23,24]. Muscle tissue with lower diameter and higher density of muscle fibers is linked with higher meat quality than muscle tissue with higher fiber area and lower fiber density [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analysis of the morphometric indicators, short period of pre-slaughter holding led to an increased number of giant fibers per units of section area and an increase in their area, which invariably have to be linked with lower meat quality [23,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased giant fibers are associated with inhumane handling of animals prior to slaughter [29][30][31], genetic profile, and breed [31,32]. The frequency and size of giant fibers determine the decline in pork quality [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%