The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity  II. A Landscape Perspective

Abstract

The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on vascular plant species richness was studied in 26 Rhode Island Audubon refuges ranging in size from 1.4 to 58.6 ha. Indices of abiotic heterogeneity reflecting spatial variation in slope, aspect, and soil drainage were calculated from extant databases in a geographic information system. After removing the influence of refuge size on both biotic diversity and geomorphological heterogeneity, vascular plant species richness was found to be highly related to geomorphological heterogeneity. Diversity in soil drainage class alone accounted for more than 50% of the variance in total plant species richness ( r 2 ϭ 0.53, p Ͻ 0.001) and was significantly related to the species richness of 10 of the 11 life-form classes of plants studied. When two refuges considered to be mathematical and biological outliers were removed from the regression analysis, soil drainage heterogeneity accounted for more than 65% of the variance in total plant species richness ( r 2 ϭ 0.67, p Ͻ 0.001). Aspect heterogeneity, slope heterogeneity, and the composite index of all three measures of geomorphological heterogeneity were each less related to total plant richness than soil drainage heterogeneity alone, but they were all more effective at predicting richness of native woody species ( r 2 ϭ 0.23-0.45, p Ͻ 0.05) than soil drainage heterogeneity ( r 2 ϭ 0.08, p Ͼ 0.05). In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, soil drainage heterogeneity and refuge size explained 66% ( p Ͻ 0.001) of the variation in species richness (soil drainage heterogeneity, partial r 2 ϭ 0.39; refuge size, partial r 2 ϭ 0.27). These results explicitly support the tenet that geomorphological heterogeneity plays a major role in determining species richness. Because biotic and abiotic diversity were intricately linked at the scale of the landscape, conservation of geomorphological heterogeneity may be an effective strategy for conserving biodiversity. Influencia de la Heterogeneidad Geomorfológica en la Biodiversidad II. Una Perspectiva de PaisajeResumen: La influencia de la heterogeneidad geomorfológica en la riqueza de especies de plantas vasculares se estudió en 26 refugios de Rhode Island Audubon que variaron en tamaño de 1.4 a 58.6 ha. Se estimaron índices de heterogeneidad abiótica reflejantes de una variación espacial en pendiente, aspecto y drenaje del suelo a partir de bases de datos de Sistemas de Información Geográfica. Una vez removida la influencia del tamaño del refugio tanto para la diversidad biótica, como para la heterogeneidad geomorfológica, la riqueza de plantas vasculares se encontró altamente relacionada con la heterogeneidad geomorfológica. Tan solo la diversidad en las clases de drenaje del suelo explicó 50% de la variabilidad en la riqueza total de especies de plantas ( r 2 ϭ 0.53, p Ͻ 0.001) y estuvo significativamente relacionada con la riqueza de plantas en 10 de las 11 clases de plantas estudiadas. Cuando dos refugios considerados matematica y biológicamente casos extremos fueron removidos del an...

Landscape Structure, Landscape Metrics and Biodiversity

“…Habitats with spatially heterogeneous abiotic conditions provide a greater variety of potentially suitable niches for plant species as habitats with homogenous characteristics. Variations in physical structure (e.g., slope direction, soil structure) have proven to be an appropriate factor for the prediction of the richness, diversity and dominance of plant species (e.g., Hobbs, 1988;Lapin and Barnes, 1995;Burnett et al, 1998;Nichols et al, 1998;Honnay et al, 2003, 241). For example, in studies by Burnett et al in deciduous forests, the sites with high geomorphological heterogeneity were those with the highest plant diversity (Burnett et al, 1998, 367-368).…”

Environmental and Human Controls of Ecosystem Functional Diversity in Temperate South America

“…In the northern hemisphere, though, Whittaker et al [51] showed how water is more limiting in southern Europe compared to energy in northern Europe and how water has greater explanatory power than energy for plant species richness compared to animals ( Table 1 and Figure 3 in Whittaker et al [51]). Many studies have also evaluated the positive relationship between stability and species richness (and vice versa); [52][53][54]) and the role that spatial heterogeneity plays in favoring richness [55][56][57]. In addition, human activities have become a major control of the Earth's system [58], affecting both biodiversity patterns and drivers [59][60][61][62][63].…”

Coastal dune topography as a determinant of abiotic conditions and biological community restoration in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

“…These variables of dune topography can modulate habitat conditions in various ways (Larkin et al 2006); For example, nutrients leaching from dune crests into valleys where plant communities are light limited results in nutrient-limited communities on crests, but greater nutrient availability in valleys (Tateno and Takeda 2003). Canopy structure changes with gradients in soil fertility and light (Nichols et al 1998;Tateno and Takeda 2003), even with limited altitudinal variation (da Silva et al 2008). This may explain patterns in plant species composition, abundance, and distribution (Chen et al 1997;Oliviera-Filho et al 1998).…”