2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12551-019-00592-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of geometry and other fundamental challenges for bio-sensing with field effect transistors

Abstract: We present a review of field effect transistors (FET) from the point of view of their applications to label-free sensing in the era of genomics and proteomics. Here, rather than a collection of Bio-FET achievements, we propose an analysis of the different issues hampering the use of these devices into clinical applications. We make a particular emphasis on the influence of the sensor geometry in the phenomena of mass transport of analytes, which is a topic that has been traditionally overlooked in the analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As proof, increasing V GS decreases channel resistance to establish a significatively I DS because the basal V DS forces the charges to flow through in the S → D direction. Whether G or channel surfaces are coated with a biorecognition element, the voltage (V G ) alteration produced by a given concentration of ions after a given biorecognition event may be assessed as a function of the analyte concentration [ 125 ]. Then, the inlet signal I GS is altered, modifying the outlet I DS into the channel, amplified for further readout processing.…”
Section: Wearable Epidermal Biosensors (Webs) Design and Mode Of Func...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As proof, increasing V GS decreases channel resistance to establish a significatively I DS because the basal V DS forces the charges to flow through in the S → D direction. Whether G or channel surfaces are coated with a biorecognition element, the voltage (V G ) alteration produced by a given concentration of ions after a given biorecognition event may be assessed as a function of the analyte concentration [ 125 ]. Then, the inlet signal I GS is altered, modifying the outlet I DS into the channel, amplified for further readout processing.…”
Section: Wearable Epidermal Biosensors (Webs) Design and Mode Of Func...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the sensor's geometry affects the time needed to produce a steady-state signal, only achieved when the union between the analyte, into the sample, and the biorecognition element, onto the biosensor, be at equilibrium [ 139 ]. To illustrate, while planar FET and WE may interact with the sample just in one of its sides (1D), nanostructures like nanowires (2D) and nanospheres (3D) include the perpendicular interaction, accomplishing the equilibrium faster, and its associated steady-state signal [ 125 ]. Thus, nanostructured devices may help overcome the required response time to detect an analyte in a real-time manner.…”
Section: Challenges Of Webs Design and Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is imperative to keep the power factor as low as possible to prevent temperature increase and accordingly cell death. Or to construct a wide-ranging biological micro-device that can identify cellular reactions and process the gathered data, digitization of blocks in conjunction with multi-array electrode systems might be needed [ 176 , 177 ]. In addition, implantable systems that are capable of real-time reporting of cellular activities set the stage for the emergence of a new category of sensing platforms.…”
Section: Non- Selective Adhesion For Cell-based Screening Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.advmattechnol.de ionic strength of the solution. [41] As a result, while the detection of relatively small analytes are straightforward, Debye screening can significantly reduce the responses for sensing of large biomolecules (e.g. proteins), where receptors (typically antibodies) can have sizes larger than the Debye length.…”
Section: Biomolecule Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%