2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of gender and product design on farmers’ preferences for weather-indexed crop insurance

Abstract: HighlightsWe identify gender-specific needs and barriers to weather-index insurance.We test farmers’ preferences for non-traditional weather-index insurance-savings bundles.Our results indicate a gender gap in farmers’ weather-index insurance product preferences.This gap appears to be caused by differences in institutional trust and financial literacy.Bundled weather-index insurance-savings disinterest women; most farmers favor standalone inundation insurance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
72
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
72
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Provider was included to identify insurance buyers' preferred provider for the hypothetical insurance schemes. This attribute addresses concerns raised by research suggesting that low insurance demand partially results from a lack of trust in private providers (Akter et al 2016;Brouwer and Akter 2010).…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Provider was included to identify insurance buyers' preferred provider for the hypothetical insurance schemes. This attribute addresses concerns raised by research suggesting that low insurance demand partially results from a lack of trust in private providers (Akter et al 2016;Brouwer and Akter 2010).…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…An attractive feature of a bundled insurance-savings contract is that it offers guaranteed payments regardless of whether outcomes (Stein and Tobacman 2015;Akter et al 2016). Our hypothetical insurance plans offered three choices to potential clients: No Return, and Partial and Full Return.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations