2014
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Gaze Control on Visual Perception: Eye Movements and Visual Stability

Abstract: Primates make several saccadic eye movements each second, and yet the retinal motion these movements generate goes unnoticed. Saccadic suppression is a profound loss of visual sensitivity occurring around the time of eye movements, and it is thought to contribute to visual stability by blunting the perception of self-generated motion. Neurophysiological studies have produced evidence that neurons throughout the visual system, including both the dorsal and ventral streams of extrastriate visual cortex, show a r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in the visual stimuli that occur within a short temporal interval around saccades go unnoticed due to saccadic suppression. Saccadic suppression is manifested in various forms, such as elevated contrast thresholds or the failure to detect small displacements that could easily be detected during fixation (review: Krock and Moore, 2014). Moreover, facilitatory effects of attention can be target-specific, justifying a target-specific enhancement or equivalently, a flanker-specific inhibition mechanism (Cepeda, Cave, Bichot, & Kim, 1998; Foley & Schwarz, 1998; Somers, Dale, Seiffert, & Tootell, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the visual stimuli that occur within a short temporal interval around saccades go unnoticed due to saccadic suppression. Saccadic suppression is manifested in various forms, such as elevated contrast thresholds or the failure to detect small displacements that could easily be detected during fixation (review: Krock and Moore, 2014). Moreover, facilitatory effects of attention can be target-specific, justifying a target-specific enhancement or equivalently, a flanker-specific inhibition mechanism (Cepeda, Cave, Bichot, & Kim, 1998; Foley & Schwarz, 1998; Somers, Dale, Seiffert, & Tootell, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primates, birds, cats, fish, and insects move their eyes, heads, or bodies to stabilize the gaze, shift gaze, sample the visual scene, or estimate distance using parallax motion cues [2][3][4][5][6] . Saccadic eye movements in primates are accompanied by a suppression of neural activity in visual areas, which serves to reduce blur during fast movement and produce an active sampling of the scene [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, sensitivity of Vis VGS neurons, as well as that of the overall population, began to decline ϳ80 ms before saccade onset. Human psychophysical contrast sensitivity begins to decline ϳ50 -75 ms before saccade onset (Diamond et al 2000;Knöll et al 2011;Krock and Moore 2014). The time course of sensitivity reduction has also been measured to begin ϳ50 ms before saccade onset in macaque extrastriate visual cortical areas V4, middle temporal (MT), and medial superior temporal (Bremmer et al 2009;Han et al 2009;Ibbotson and Krekelberg 2011;Ibbotson et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source(s) of saccadic suppression. Neural correlates of saccadic suppression have been observed in visual responses throughout the visual and saccadic systems, but the source of suppression in these areas is not known (Bremmer et al 2009;Han et al 2009;Hass and Horwitz 2011;Krock and Moore 2014;Robinson and Wurtz 1976;Thiele et al 2002). Psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have furnished evidence for the involvement of an active, extraretinal-suppres-sive mechanism coupled to eye-movement planning, implicating the saccadic system Diamond et al 2000;Han et al 2009;Robinson and Wurtz 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%