2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2339598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Fundamental Factors to Liquidity Risk on Banking Industry: Comparative Study between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies demonstrate major liquidity risk factors, for instance profitability (Akhtar et al, 2011;Iqbal, 2012), size (Iqbal, 2012;Ramzan & Zafar, 2012), financial leverage (Ahmed et al, 2011;Iqbal, 2012), capital adequacy (Iqbal, 2012), and tangibility and age (Ahmed et al, 2012). At the same moment, Muharam and Kurnia (2012) conducted a study on Islamic banks liquidity risk in Indonesia and found that there is a positively significant by profitability factors which measure via return on asset (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), while capital adequacy indicated negative relationship which contradict to Iqbal (2012).…”
Section: Past Studies Of Liquidity Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies demonstrate major liquidity risk factors, for instance profitability (Akhtar et al, 2011;Iqbal, 2012), size (Iqbal, 2012;Ramzan & Zafar, 2012), financial leverage (Ahmed et al, 2011;Iqbal, 2012), capital adequacy (Iqbal, 2012), and tangibility and age (Ahmed et al, 2012). At the same moment, Muharam and Kurnia (2012) conducted a study on Islamic banks liquidity risk in Indonesia and found that there is a positively significant by profitability factors which measure via return on asset (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), while capital adequacy indicated negative relationship which contradict to Iqbal (2012).…”
Section: Past Studies Of Liquidity Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is a negative and significant association between the gearing ratio, the nonperforming loans ratio, and the liquidity risk. Muharam and Kurnia (2012) investigated Islamic and conventional banks' liquidity in Indonesia for the period 2007-2011. They highlight a positive and significant impact of net interest margin and return on equity on the liquidity risk of Islamic bank.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this controversial, a balancing view see that the Islamic and conventional banks have the same number of risk factors although they are differing due to differences in the contractual system and returns' approach. (Muharam, 2013;Effendi & Disman, 2017).…”
Section: Liquidity Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Iqbal (2012) argued that the liquidity position in Islamic banks is better than in conventional banks. Also, Muharam (2013) examined liquidity risk for 6 Islamic banks in Indonesia during the period 2007-2011 by comparing conventional and Islamic banks. The study investigated the influence of CAR, ROA, ROE, Net Interest Margin (NIM), liquidity gaps, and Risky Liquid Assets (RLA) to liquidity risk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%