1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(97)00072-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of FRP inserts on the energy absorption of a foam-cored sandwich panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where w is the displacement at mid-span (measured at the surface opposite to the loading pin to avoid errors due to indentation [12]), P is the applied load per unit width, L is the span between the supports and DQ is the shear stiffness. Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Analytical-numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where w is the displacement at mid-span (measured at the surface opposite to the loading pin to avoid errors due to indentation [12]), P is the applied load per unit width, L is the span between the supports and DQ is the shear stiffness. Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Analytical-numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrugated-core sandwich concepts with various geometries (the most recurring being the trapezoidal and the sinusoidal shapes) have been proposed since the beginning of the last century [10]. Applications have been for many years limited to whole metallic or cardboard structures, and the extension to fully FRP solutions dates around the end of last century [11][12][13]. One reason for the special appeal of this class of sandwiches is the improved in-plane crashworthiness and out of plane impact resistance, mainly obtained by the more difficult skin-core debonding due to the generally stronger joining between the corrugated core and the skin faces [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations imply that each of the approaches can be used for the modeling of the behavior of the panel with the embedded inclusion. Hence, preferring one approach 1 In Approaches I and II, the definition of the internal stress resultants in the rigid insert are inherent in the mathematical formulation of the model. On the other hand, in Approach III the stress resultants are not explicitly defined in the model.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armor plates composed of ceramic tiles, rubber joints, and outer composite layers (Mahdi and Gillespie 2004), sandwich panels with embedded rigid inserts (Found et al 1997;Burchardt 1998;Thomsen and Rits 1998;Thomsen 1998;Mamalis et al 2002;Bozhevolnayaa et al 2004;Bozhevolnayaa and Lyckegaard 2005;Rabinovitch 2007), and coating for electronic packaging (Anderson et al 2009), are examples of such applications. Another example is found in masonry walls upgraded with externally bonded composite materials and fiber reinforced polymers (FRP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%