2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of framework design on the load-bearing capacity of laboratory-made inlay-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, inter-abutment distance varied between 7 to 15 mm in different studies (Keulemans et al, 2009;Mehl et al, 2010;Nakamura et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009;Song et al, 2003;Waki et al, 2006). In a previous study, it was reported that the fracture strength of inlay-retained FDPs reinforced with FRC was reduced by about 25 to 35% when the inter-abutment distance was increased from 7 to 11 mm (Song et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, inter-abutment distance varied between 7 to 15 mm in different studies (Keulemans et al, 2009;Mehl et al, 2010;Nakamura et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009;Song et al, 2003;Waki et al, 2006). In a previous study, it was reported that the fracture strength of inlay-retained FDPs reinforced with FRC was reduced by about 25 to 35% when the inter-abutment distance was increased from 7 to 11 mm (Song et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the morphology of the pontic may also affect the fracture strength 13 (Özcan et al, 2005a). Recent studies presented significant differences between different pontic forms (Chen et al, 2011;Keulemans et al, 2009). In this study, the steel ball form was used to avoid any interference of the cusp height that could affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical situation could be simulated by investigating non-rigidly mounted abutments with an elastic modulus similar to that of natural teeth 4,30) . Although the physiological mobility of teeth was simulated with an emulated periodontal ligament, it must still be emphasized that steel abutments with an elastic modulus of 180 GPa were used, whereas natural teeth only have an elastic modulus ranging approximately from 15 (dentin) to 85 (enamel) GPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study showed that increasing the elastic modulus of the abutments results in increased fracture load [21]. Nonrigidly mounted abutments with an elastic modulus similar to that of natural teeth behave similarly to the clinical situation [2,22]. In addition, in this study the FDPs Constant clinical occlusal forces of 12 to 90 N and occasional maximum forces up to 909 N in posterior areas can be assumed depending on the type of measurement, gender, restoration type, diet, and other parameters [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%