2015
DOI: 10.34272/forest.2015.19.1.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Forest Activity Intervention on Anxiety, Depression, Profile of Mood States(POMS) and Hope of Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve studies reported depression as an outcome, of which seven used the Beck Depression Inventory (Bang et al, 2016, 2017; Cho et al, 2008; Chun et al, 2017; Han et al, 2016), two used Zung's Depression Scale (Choi & Ha, 2014; You et al, 2014), two used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Kim et al, 2015; Pálsdóttir et al, 2020) and one used Geriatric Depression Scale—Korea Version (Lim et al, 2014). Data from 10 studies were included in the meta‐analysis, providing no intervention in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twelve studies reported depression as an outcome, of which seven used the Beck Depression Inventory (Bang et al, 2016, 2017; Cho et al, 2008; Chun et al, 2017; Han et al, 2016), two used Zung's Depression Scale (Choi & Ha, 2014; You et al, 2014), two used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Kim et al, 2015; Pálsdóttir et al, 2020) and one used Geriatric Depression Scale—Korea Version (Lim et al, 2014). Data from 10 studies were included in the meta‐analysis, providing no intervention in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies reported anxiety as an outcome, of which six used the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Cho et al, 2008; Chun et al, 2017; de Brito et al, 2019; Koselka et al, 2019; Sin & Lee, 2018b; Song et al, 2019) and two used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Kim et al, 2015; Pálsdóttir et al, 2020). Data from the seven studies (Cho et al, 2008; Chun et al, 2017; de Brito et al, 2019; Kim et al, 2015; Park et al, 2015; Sin et al, 2018; Song et al, 2019) were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled SMD was −0.84 (95% CI −1.42, −0.25, p = 0.005), and substantial heterogeneity was observed ( χ 2 = 31.39, p < 0.001, I 2 = 84%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%