The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of Fermi motion on the comparison of the polarization transfer to a proton in elastic ep and quasi-elastic e

Abstract: A comparison between polarization-transfer to a bound proton in quasi-free kinematics by the A( e, e p) knockout reaction and that in elastic scattering off a free proton can provide information on the characteristics of the bound proton. In the past the reported measurements have been compared to those of a free proton with zero initial momentum. We introduce, for the first time, expressions for the polarization-transfer components when the proton is initially in motion and compare them to the 2 H data measur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of the polarization transfer components and their ratios on Q 2 (due to the form factors) and other kinematic effects are reduced by dividing the measured values by the expected ones for elastic ep scattering with similar kinematics [13][14][15]27]. We use the "moving-proton" prescription [27,28], rather than the expressions for elastic scattering off a resting proton [10]. In this prescription, each measured quasi-elastic event is compared to an elastic event that has the same incident electron energy (k 0 ), the same magnitude of the four-momentum transfer (Q 2 ), and the same initial proton momentum (− p miss ) as the measured quasi-elastic event.…”
Section: Measured Polarization-transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dependence of the polarization transfer components and their ratios on Q 2 (due to the form factors) and other kinematic effects are reduced by dividing the measured values by the expected ones for elastic ep scattering with similar kinematics [13][14][15]27]. We use the "moving-proton" prescription [27,28], rather than the expressions for elastic scattering off a resting proton [10]. In this prescription, each measured quasi-elastic event is compared to an elastic event that has the same incident electron energy (k 0 ), the same magnitude of the four-momentum transfer (Q 2 ), and the same initial proton momentum (− p miss ) as the measured quasi-elastic event.…”
Section: Measured Polarization-transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this prescription, each measured quasi-elastic event is compared to an elastic event that has the same incident electron energy (k 0 ), the same magnitude of the four-momentum transfer (Q 2 ), and the same initial proton momentum (− p miss ) as the measured quasi-elastic event. Full details on the expressions for the polarization transfer observables are given in [27,28]. In Fig.…”
Section: Measured Polarization-transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations