2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy

Abstract: Fellowship training correlated with significant differences in surgeon experience, operative approach, and use of available fistula mitigation strategies for PD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has an additional peculiarity: while previous reports analysing the impact of PAP on post‐operative outcomes focused on patients undergoing a PJ as pancreatoenteric continuity restoration modality in the majority of cases, all 102 patients analysed here underwent a PG using a binding technique. An international survey published in 2016 has reported PJ as the preferred anastomotic method used worldwide; 22 however, PG is increasingly used due to supposed advantages compared to PJ: results from previous randomized clinical trials and meta‐analyses comparing PG and PJ, even if contrasting in some cases, seem to indicate that PG is associated with lower rates of POPF and higher rates of PPH, 22,23 and our results are consistent with such data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study has an additional peculiarity: while previous reports analysing the impact of PAP on post‐operative outcomes focused on patients undergoing a PJ as pancreatoenteric continuity restoration modality in the majority of cases, all 102 patients analysed here underwent a PG using a binding technique. An international survey published in 2016 has reported PJ as the preferred anastomotic method used worldwide; 22 however, PG is increasingly used due to supposed advantages compared to PJ: results from previous randomized clinical trials and meta‐analyses comparing PG and PJ, even if contrasting in some cases, seem to indicate that PG is associated with lower rates of POPF and higher rates of PPH, 22,23 and our results are consistent with such data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The modality of pancreato-enteric continuity restoration following PD represents one of the greatest controversies in pancreatic surgery. PJ has been reported as the preferred anastomotic method in an international survey recently published [16] and IJL-PJ, first described in 1978, has been associated with some benefits, related to the diversion of biliary secretions from the pancreatic anastomosis, which may avoid activation of pancreatic proenzymes and, thereby, theoretically protect the anastomotic healing [17][18][19][20]. However, previous studies comparing PG and PJ seem favoring PG in terms of rate of POPF [21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only the number of surgeries, but also the surgeon's experience and age may influence the result with sometimes even an increased mortality and morbidity risk in very experienced surgeons who have been working in their discipline for more than 20 years [190][191][192]. Some studies reveal a benefit of specialization with regard to the outcome [187,[193][194][195]. It seems reasonable to consider other factors such as the quality of surgical performance and adjuvant therapies, that might influence the outcome, as well [196,197].…”
Section: Surgical Training/surgeon-specific Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%