2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00563-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of facial types on the morphology and location of the greater palatine foramen: a CBCT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the right GPF-CP was 27.48±3.10 mm and 29.27±3.59 mm whereas the length of the left GPF-CP was 26.71±2.82 mm and 29.33±3.14 mm in females and males, respectively. In a CT study evaluating the relationship between facial types and GPC, Lacerda-Santos et al (21) found that the distance between GPF and the palatine suture was 14.47±1.63 mm on the right and 15.16±1.67 mm on the left and this difference was significant, unlike this study. Ortug and Uzel (22) found the same distance of 14.64±2.20 mm on the right and 14.74±2.22 mm on the left in their measurements on 97 dry skulls and stated that this difference was not significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The length of the right GPF-CP was 27.48±3.10 mm and 29.27±3.59 mm whereas the length of the left GPF-CP was 26.71±2.82 mm and 29.33±3.14 mm in females and males, respectively. In a CT study evaluating the relationship between facial types and GPC, Lacerda-Santos et al (21) found that the distance between GPF and the palatine suture was 14.47±1.63 mm on the right and 15.16±1.67 mm on the left and this difference was significant, unlike this study. Ortug and Uzel (22) found the same distance of 14.64±2.20 mm on the right and 14.74±2.22 mm on the left in their measurements on 97 dry skulls and stated that this difference was not significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…A total of 23 studies [ 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 20 , 29 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 47 , 54 , 56 , 58 , 65 , 66 , 73 , 74 , 77 , 80 , 82 , 83 , 86 ] ( n = 3164 subjects) reported data on the distance from the greater palatine foramen to the incisive fossa (GPF–IF). The pooled mean, across the 23 studies, was calculated to be 37.32 mm (95% CI = 36.19–38.45 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 5 studies [ 9 , 11 , 17 , 44 , 52 ] ( n = 710 subjects) reported data on the angle between the vertical plane and the axis of the greater palatine canal. The pooled mean, across the four studies, was calculated to be 19.09° (95% CI = 9.20–28.99°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of the great palatal nerve and blood vessel bundles is the main consideration in the gingival surgery with the palate as the donor site, the accurate assessment of palatal vessels and nerves by the location of the greater palatal foramen is key to preoperative planning, postoperative healing, and revascularization of the periodontal ligament and gingiva [24] . Multiple studies have shown that there is some racial specificity in the location of the greater palatal foramen [25,26] , and that the greater palatal neurovascular bundles can be distributed in the palatal sulcus of a variety of morphologies in the maxillary molar region [27] .…”
Section: The Position Of the Foramen Magnummentioning
confidence: 99%