2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-015-3773-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of elevation on soil properties and forest litter in the Siliceous Moncayo Massif, SW Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the results of this study, other studies from mountain areas have shown an increasing C/N ratio of the topsoil with elevation depending on the kind of litter [66][67][68]. Moreover, Cools et al [20] found a distinct relationship between the topsoil C/N ratio and the humus form.…”
Section: Upscaling Of Microbiological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to the results of this study, other studies from mountain areas have shown an increasing C/N ratio of the topsoil with elevation depending on the kind of litter [66][67][68]. Moreover, Cools et al [20] found a distinct relationship between the topsoil C/N ratio and the humus form.…”
Section: Upscaling Of Microbiological Parameterssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Egli et al [87] investigated mountain soils also within the area of this study and found a higher percentage of weakly degraded organic matter as well as higher soil organic carbon concentrations at northern slope exposure as compared to southern slope exposure. Other studies described patterns similar to this study regarding humus forms, pH values and soil C/N ratio along an elevation gradient (e.g., [66,88]). …”
Section: Soil Ecological Implicationssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this difference could be related to the elevation at which soils were sampled, since Carceller [15] worked at 1580-1600 m.a.s.l. and Badía et al [10] indicated increasing Al 3+ content with altitude in the Moncayo massif. …”
Section: Soil Chemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, the introduction of pine forests in deforested areas that were formerly covered by beech stands may induce changes in soil properties [9] as biomass production, and its decomposition is different for each species [8]. Some studies have shown a higher accumulation of C and N in the litter of pine forests, but better integration of these in the mineral soil of beech forests [9][10][11][12]. Nevertheless, Leuschner et al [9], 51-128 years after the afforestation with Scots pine, detected a 50-80% decrease in organic C and N down to a 60 cm depth compared to soils below the original beech forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study areas in the high mountains were found to be characterized by a high small-scale variability of humus forms related to micro-topography and local ground cover differences [9][10][11]. At the landscape scale, environmental factors such as climate, relief, parent material, vegetation, and land use shape landscape units with different humus systems [12][13][14][15]. In mountain environments with similar geological conditions, relief is the most decisive factor, as it controls mesoclimate, hydrological processes, erosion dynamics and vegetation zones [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%