2004
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of electrospray deposition in matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry sample preparation for synthetic polymers

Abstract: Although electrospray sample deposition in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS) sample preparation increases the repeatability of both the MALDI signal intensity and the measured molecular mass distribution (MMD), the electrospray sample deposition method may influence the apparent MMD of a synthetic polymer. The MMDs of three polymers of differing thermal stability, polystyrene (PS), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and poly(propylene glycol) (PPG), were studied by MALDI time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two trends appear when looking at the depositions made with amorphous polymers: (1) IBF depositions yielded larger crystal depositions; (2) IBF depositions having the same volume and concentration when compared to their MP counterparts were more compact, occupying less physical surface area on both the steel AB MALDI plate and glass slides. As previously mentioned, studies have shown and promoted that smaller homogenous crystallization as the preferred and most productive morphology that renders quality MALDI signals [31][32][33]. In this study, we present evidence from cross-polarization microscopy that directly contradicts the commonly held belief that only smaller homogenous crystals produce quality signal.…”
Section: Amorphous Polymer Samplescontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two trends appear when looking at the depositions made with amorphous polymers: (1) IBF depositions yielded larger crystal depositions; (2) IBF depositions having the same volume and concentration when compared to their MP counterparts were more compact, occupying less physical surface area on both the steel AB MALDI plate and glass slides. As previously mentioned, studies have shown and promoted that smaller homogenous crystallization as the preferred and most productive morphology that renders quality MALDI signals [31][32][33]. In this study, we present evidence from cross-polarization microscopy that directly contradicts the commonly held belief that only smaller homogenous crystals produce quality signal.…”
Section: Amorphous Polymer Samplescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…It has been reported that micropipette 'dried droplet' polymer depositions have high local deposition variability and this variability leads to less reproducible signals [31,32]. A consequence of this heterogeneity of deposition is that characteristic data (M N and M W ) have high degrees of variance and are not accurate enough for polymer classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although playing important role in establishing the transmission geometry LDI sources, this setup was not readily applicable for imaging applications. There were also several reports of using the laser focusing optics inside the vacuum chamber by employing reflective optics in a Cassegrain scheme, providing a longer working distance, for example LIMA instrument (Cambridge Mass Spectrometry, Cambridge, UK) [5]. The reflective objectives however introduce additional diffraction limits and aberrations and the minimum laser spot sizes are larger, for example 1–3 μm at 266 nm wavelength in LIMA-2A [6] and were useful only for profiling applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters, as well as laser energy, were most influential for the polystyrene with dithranol as the matrix. any factors influence the quality of matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of flight (TOF) mass spectra of synthetic polymers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Foremost is the nature of the sample itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detector voltage influences the sensitivity of the detector, but if the detector voltage is too high, a loss in the signal-to-noise may result because of the increase in background noise. To keep the design relatively simple and the amount of data to a minimum, we chose to concentrate on only two sample preparation parameters: matrix type and polymer concentration [6,8,10,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%