1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(79)80254-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of electrical and mechanical anharmonicity on the vibrational transition moments of diatomic and polyatomic molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be easily shown that the transition matrix elements for the dipole moment and polarizability operators in terms of anharmonic wave functions are equal to the matrix elements of contact transformed operators with wave functions of the zero order approximation [37][38][39][40][41][42]. Indeed, let and be the zero order and the anharmonic wave functions, respectively, and µ α be the effective dipole moment operator (its projection onto the axis ); the following equality then holds true:…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be easily shown that the transition matrix elements for the dipole moment and polarizability operators in terms of anharmonic wave functions are equal to the matrix elements of contact transformed operators with wave functions of the zero order approximation [37][38][39][40][41][42]. Indeed, let and be the zero order and the anharmonic wave functions, respectively, and µ α be the effective dipole moment operator (its projection onto the axis ); the following equality then holds true:…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since the density of the anharmonic energy spec trum sharply increases with increasing energy, anhar monic calculations of IR and Raman intensities [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] are very helpful in the interpretation of the spec trum. Because intensities can be significantly redis tributed between close resonantly coupled vibrational states, the harmonic model is insufficient and it is nec essary to take into account explicitly mixing of zero order functions.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthwhile noting that these linear combinations of the zero-order basis functions should not be confused with the wave functions of the original Hamiltonian, which can be obtained through a series of inverse canonical transformations of the zero-order ones. 13,70 The matrix representation of the polyad operator is obviously a block-diagonal matrix, so that its blocks, corresponding to a given polyad number P, are simply scalar matrices with the coefficient P on the diagonal. It is evident that the polyad operatorP commutes with the zero-order Hamilto-nianĤ 0 whose wave functions are used as the basis functions for matrix representation of the perturbed anharmonic Hamil-tonian.…”
Section: E Polyad Vector Number Operator and Commutability Of A Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, the magnitude of m EA becomes 1.0 × 10 −2 D, which is comparable to m MA bend = 5.8 × 10 −3 D. It is generally accepted that for high-frequency intramolecular vibrations, anharmonic coupling is usually dominated by the mechanical anharmonicity. 9,49 In addition, the electrical anharmonicity seems to play a crucial role only in hydrogen-bonded systems 30,50,51 and other types of molecular complexes, 52 in which non-covalent interactions are involved. However, the present DFT calculations suggest that both m MA bend and m EA may contribute equally to the anharmonic coupling between the ν 1 and ν 4 modes.…”
Section: E Mechanical Vs Electrical Anharmonicity: Insight From Dft mentioning
confidence: 99%