2021
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2021.1931915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of economic institution on finance sector credit allocation in China

Abstract: Since the supply-side reform, the credit allocation from the finance sector is more concentrated in state-owned enterprises (S.O.E.s). It results in a mismatch between the credit allocation and the economic contribution of private enterprises (P.E.s). In China, we find that government intervention in the finance sector to allocate credit to S.O.E.s helps to achieve sustainable growth. Because of the ownership relationship, the credit allocation to S.O.E.s will also produce social or political interests for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this seems “cruel”, it is consistent with China’s reality. Some Chinese researchers offered evidence in support of property right nature heterogeneity when they observed non-state-owned enterprises improved investment efficiency through mixed-ownership reform, and the mechanism reduced financing constraints, which improved “discrimination” to a certain extent [ 48 , 49 ]. In previous studies, size heterogeneity is usually reflected between large and medium enterprises, while the difference between medium and small (micro) enterprises is rarely discussed.…”
Section: Empirical Research: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this seems “cruel”, it is consistent with China’s reality. Some Chinese researchers offered evidence in support of property right nature heterogeneity when they observed non-state-owned enterprises improved investment efficiency through mixed-ownership reform, and the mechanism reduced financing constraints, which improved “discrimination” to a certain extent [ 48 , 49 ]. In previous studies, size heterogeneity is usually reflected between large and medium enterprises, while the difference between medium and small (micro) enterprises is rarely discussed.…”
Section: Empirical Research: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, financial capacity has a significant influence on M&As, which is consistent with [ 28 , 29 ]. However, under the traditional financing model, the financing needs of most enterprises cannot be met due to a credit mismatch [ 30 ]. To be more specific, there are two main types of mismatches: supply and demand mismatch and domain mismatch.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, institutional investors may mostly be government-related; hence, the monitoring effect would dominate. The involvement of the Chinese government in ownership and control improves firmsʼ corporate governance, develops market and legal regulations (Qian, 2001), and enables firms to achieve sustainable growth (Li, 2021). In China, the perception is that a high equity stake by the state lowers uncertainties about the firm value (Mok & Hui, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, the perception is that a high equity stake by the state lowers uncertainties about the firm value (Mok & Hui, 1998). Therefore, government intervention and ownership relationships are the main factors affecting the efficiency of capital allocation in China (Li, 2021). In this argument, it is contended that domestic investors interpret a high percentage of equity retention as confidence in the firm in an emerging market with high information asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%