1989
DOI: 10.2307/1387252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Economic and Demographic Factors on Rural Church Viability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Congregations in rural neighborhoods report more growth relative to urban congregations. This last finding could reflect growth due to consolidation of small congregations, which was the conclusion of Rathge and Goreham () for their finding that rural counties with larger average church sizes produce fewer new churches. On the other hand, Neitz () notes that rural congregations often are resistant to merging, which might raise questions about such an explanation, and there is anecdotal evidence of rural congregations growing through innovation and recruitment (Goldstein and Garfield ).…”
Section: Leadership Transition and Membership Declinementioning
confidence: 67%
“…Congregations in rural neighborhoods report more growth relative to urban congregations. This last finding could reflect growth due to consolidation of small congregations, which was the conclusion of Rathge and Goreham () for their finding that rural counties with larger average church sizes produce fewer new churches. On the other hand, Neitz () notes that rural congregations often are resistant to merging, which might raise questions about such an explanation, and there is anecdotal evidence of rural congregations growing through innovation and recruitment (Goldstein and Garfield ).…”
Section: Leadership Transition and Membership Declinementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, traditional systems of support have declined as (a) younger rural family members have moved to more urban areas for economic opportunities (Broomhall & Johnson, 1994;Keller & Murray, 1982;Rodgers & Rodgers, 1997); (b) informal community supports, such as those found in churches, have increasingly been faced with smaller numbers, older and more dependent members, and decreasing monetary support (Rathge & Goreham, 1989); and (c) local governments have faced revenue loss because of shrinking tax bases (Bull, 1998;Hattery & Koch, 1995;Hill, 1988;Reed, 1992). In contrast to prevailing perceptions of integrative informal exchanges, Hofferth and Iceland (1998) recently demonstrated that rural residents, rather than receiving assistance from multiple types of people in their informal networks, were more likely to exchange support exclusively among family members compared with their urban counterparts.…”
Section: Rural Residence and Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, estimating which forces encouraged effective evangelism is not very different from estimating which factors most directly influence contemporary church growth, a question with which sociologists of religion have grappled since the late 1970s. Church-growth specialists separated internal factors (or institutional variables) from external factors (or contextual variables) and then determined which set of variables had the greatest impact on whether congregations attracted or lost members (for example, see Hoge and Roozen 1979;McKinney and Hoge 1983;Rathge and Goreham 1989;Hadaway 1991). Similarly, demand-and supply-side theories can be tested by seeing which social factors were associated with evangelistic success and failure at the congregational level.…”
Section: Evaluating Demand-side and Supply-side Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%