“…Some studies have indicated that shade selection improves with experience, while others did not find any differences between experienced dentists and those less experienced . Participants in this study had never taken the FM‐100 test, and had very little experience in shade selection except for their limited time shadowing or assisting in dental offices.…”
“…Some studies have indicated that shade selection improves with experience, while others did not find any differences between experienced dentists and those less experienced . Participants in this study had never taken the FM‐100 test, and had very little experience in shade selection except for their limited time shadowing or assisting in dental offices.…”
“…18 But various studies also report no influence of clinical experience in shade perception and selection. 14,[19][20][21] There are also studies which report the increase in shade matching ability of an individual after color education and training programs.…”
Objective
Shade matching is a critical procedure in prosthetic dentistry. The correct identification of the shade by the doctor as well as the perception of the shade by the dental technician becomes critical due to the high patient expectations. The current study aims to evaluate the effect of gender and clinical experience on shade perception by dental professionals.
Materials and Methods
A total of 100 dental professionals with normal color vision who were categorized as dental students, dental doctors, and dental specialists were included in the study. Masked A2 and B2 shades tabs were made to match with a complete set of shade guide. The obtained data were entered, coded, and analyzed using SPSS version 17 for Windows.
Results
Total number of participants who identified both shade tabs correctly was 44%. There were no statistically significant differences among the gender or the clinical experience with regard to correct identification of shade tabs.
Conclusion
Within its limitations of fewer number (two) of shade tabs for comparison, the study concludes that multiple opinions may be taken clinically irrespective of the gender or clinical experience as gender and experience do not have a significant role to play for shade matching in prosthetic and restorative dentistry.
“…These results are in accordance with the study by Musskopf et al 18 who concluded that patients and prosthodontists have different perceptions related to symmetry and esthetics around gingival margins of cemented crowns. 19 Moreover, patient's ability to detect symmetry cannot be relied when the evaluation is miniscule. Since this study used 3DMaster shade guide in both clinics and production laboratory, this could explain the good results in shade in this study, which is in agreement with Nakhaei et al, 19 who concluded that shade guide has an effect on shadematching results.…”
Section: Patient Dentist Evaluation Of the Quality Of Esthetic Of Cemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Moreover, patient's ability to detect symmetry cannot be relied when the evaluation is miniscule. Since this study used 3DMaster shade guide in both clinics and production laboratory, this could explain the good results in shade in this study, which is in agreement with Nakhaei et al, 19 who concluded that shade guide has an effect on shadematching results.…”
Section: Patient Dentist Evaluation Of the Quality Of Esthetic Of Cemmentioning
Introduction: Esthetic perceptions could differ between the dentist and his patients among various regions and cultures.Aim: The aims of this study were to evaluate the subjective differences between the dentist and the patient in terms of esthetics of metal-ceramic crowns (MCcs). The study also aims to compare the mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) dimensions of the cemented crown with its respective natural antimeric tooth.
Materials and methods:A total of 85 patients seeking treatment for a single crown (MC) were treated by the undergraduate students under supervision of respective academic staff. After cementation of the crowns, a 9-point questionnaire was given to patient and different dentists. A treatment cast for every single crown was poured. Then, the MD and BL dimensions of the crowns were compared against their respective antimeric tooth.
Results:The dentists and the patients agreed in the range of 50.5 to 90.5%. Least subjective differences were found for the length and width of the cemented crowns. The highest differences were noted for symmetry between the cemented crown and its antimeric natural tooth. A total of 31 to 38% of the patients differed from the dentist's evaluation for shade of the crown, color of the crown at the margin, contour of the crown, and the relationship of the crowns with the surrounding gingiva. The highest MD and BL dimensions were in the cemented crown of canines, while the lowest MD and BL diameters were for the cemented crowns of the lateral incisor crowns.
Conclusion:Dentist and patient mostly agreed in terms of length (90%), width (81%) and relation of crown with free gingiva (74%). However, they differed mostly on the symmetry of the Clinical significance: While fabricating a dental prosthesis, the dentist must know about patients' perception of esthetics; otherwise both clinical and laboratory efforts would not be enough to satisfy the esthetic needs of the patient even if the restoration is technically correct. Perceptions related to symmetry differ mostly between dentist and patient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.