The Influence of Demographics and Household‐Specific Price Indices on Consumption‐Based Inequality and Welfare: A Comparison of Spain and the United States

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that inequality is lower in Spain than in the United States when it is based on income. For the present article, both inequality and social welfare are examined, with household consumption expenditures used as a proxy for household welfare. For tractability, equivalence scales depended only on the number of people in the household. Household‐specific price indices were used to express the 1990‐1991 expenditure distributions in 1981 and 1991 winter prices. Our results reveal that inequality and welfare comparisons are drastically different for smaller and larger households. When all households are considered, the two‐country comparison suggests that the income inequality ranking can only be maintained for expenditure distributions when economies of scale are small or nonexistent. However, welfare is always higher in the United States than in Spain. Because inflation during the 1980s in both countries was essentially distributionally neutral, all results appear to be robust to the choice of time period.

Does credit access lead to expansion of income and multidimensional poverty? A study of rural Assam

“…Thus, the study argues that the measurement of income per capita can overstate the level of deprivation. In line with our results, Garner et al (2002), while discussing the consumption-based inequality and welfare of Spain and USA, argued the importance of household demographic characteristics and equivalence scale adjustments for international comparisons. It was showed that adjustment helps to overcome a bias causing an overestimation of adults’ and an underestimation of children’s needs-based equivalence weights (Borah et al , 2016; Blaylock, 1991).…”

Downward income mobility among individuals with poor initial health is linked with higher cardiometabolic risk

“…The destination SEP measure is derived from Wave 5 personal income, also divided into quintiles. To account for individuals’ household size at Waves 1 and 5, we adjusted household and personal income based on equivalence scales (income/(household size) 0.5 ) used in the previous research for the United States ( 52 , 53 ). We estimated individuals’ intergenerational income mobility as the difference between Waves 1 and 5 income quintiles.…”

Health Insurance Deductibles and Health Care–Seeking Behaviors in a Consumer-Driven Health Care System With Universal Coverage

“…Household income was adjusted to household size using an equivalence scales method: income/(household size) 0.5 . Tertiles of household income were used when analyses were stratified by this variable.…”