2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of dairy salts on nanofiltration membrane charge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows that this membrane resistance changed by less than 0.2 × 10 13 m −1 over the entire pH range examined. A resistance minimum was observed at approximately pH 4.5 which corresponded quite closely to the measured surface isoelectric point (IEP) of the membrane [17]. Childress and Elimelech [20] observed a similar peak in flux for a different polyamide NF membrane, and attributed this to pore expansion due to uncharged functional groups within the pores at the pore IEP.…”
Section: Influence Of Ph and Salt Concentration On Water Fluxsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 shows that this membrane resistance changed by less than 0.2 × 10 13 m −1 over the entire pH range examined. A resistance minimum was observed at approximately pH 4.5 which corresponded quite closely to the measured surface isoelectric point (IEP) of the membrane [17]. Childress and Elimelech [20] observed a similar peak in flux for a different polyamide NF membrane, and attributed this to pore expansion due to uncharged functional groups within the pores at the pore IEP.…”
Section: Influence Of Ph and Salt Concentration On Water Fluxsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These are polyamide thin-film composite membranes with an observed molecular weight cutoff of 150-200 Da and chloride rejection of 40-55%. Further characteristics of this membrane material are outlined in a companion paper [17]. In all experiments filtration was performed at a flowrate of between 2 and 3 L/min which equated to a cross-flow velocity across the membrane surface of between 0.4 and 0.6 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, membranes should be neutral or of the same charge as the particles being processed to prevent attraction, which can result in fouling. For process design, the pH of the feed stream needs to be considered as the membrane charge is influenced by the pH of the fluid in touch with the membrane surface (Rice et al ., 2011). Some membrane materials, for example polyamide, can exhibit amphoteric behaviour; here the pH of the cleaning agent should condition the surface with a charge appropriate for the feed being processed in the following production period (Tang et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Membrane Polarity and Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in shape can also be due to high shear prevalent at the membrane surface (Cheryan, 1998). The pH of an aqueous solution not only has a bearing on particle size and electrostatic potential of many components in the solution itself, but can also change the surface charge on the membrane as discussed above (Bouzid et al ., 2008;Rice et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Steric Effects On Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%