“…1 shows that this membrane resistance changed by less than 0.2 × 10 13 m −1 over the entire pH range examined. A resistance minimum was observed at approximately pH 4.5 which corresponded quite closely to the measured surface isoelectric point (IEP) of the membrane [17]. Childress and Elimelech [20] observed a similar peak in flux for a different polyamide NF membrane, and attributed this to pore expansion due to uncharged functional groups within the pores at the pore IEP.…”
Section: Influence Of Ph and Salt Concentration On Water Fluxsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These are polyamide thin-film composite membranes with an observed molecular weight cutoff of 150-200 Da and chloride rejection of 40-55%. Further characteristics of this membrane material are outlined in a companion paper [17]. In all experiments filtration was performed at a flowrate of between 2 and 3 L/min which equated to a cross-flow velocity across the membrane surface of between 0.4 and 0.6 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to the membrane charge can occur due to adsorption of solutes [17], membrane fouling [18] and also through charge shielding. These can influence the rejection of other charged species.…”
“…1 shows that this membrane resistance changed by less than 0.2 × 10 13 m −1 over the entire pH range examined. A resistance minimum was observed at approximately pH 4.5 which corresponded quite closely to the measured surface isoelectric point (IEP) of the membrane [17]. Childress and Elimelech [20] observed a similar peak in flux for a different polyamide NF membrane, and attributed this to pore expansion due to uncharged functional groups within the pores at the pore IEP.…”
Section: Influence Of Ph and Salt Concentration On Water Fluxsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These are polyamide thin-film composite membranes with an observed molecular weight cutoff of 150-200 Da and chloride rejection of 40-55%. Further characteristics of this membrane material are outlined in a companion paper [17]. In all experiments filtration was performed at a flowrate of between 2 and 3 L/min which equated to a cross-flow velocity across the membrane surface of between 0.4 and 0.6 m/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to the membrane charge can occur due to adsorption of solutes [17], membrane fouling [18] and also through charge shielding. These can influence the rejection of other charged species.…”
“…Generally, membranes should be neutral or of the same charge as the particles being processed to prevent attraction, which can result in fouling. For process design, the pH of the feed stream needs to be considered as the membrane charge is influenced by the pH of the fluid in touch with the membrane surface (Rice et al ., 2011). Some membrane materials, for example polyamide, can exhibit amphoteric behaviour; here the pH of the cleaning agent should condition the surface with a charge appropriate for the feed being processed in the following production period (Tang et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Membrane Polarity and Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in shape can also be due to high shear prevalent at the membrane surface (Cheryan, 1998). The pH of an aqueous solution not only has a bearing on particle size and electrostatic potential of many components in the solution itself, but can also change the surface charge on the membrane as discussed above (Bouzid et al ., 2008;Rice et al ., 2011).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.