2017
DOI: 10.1111/sji.12594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Cytomegalovirus on Expression of HLA‐G and its Ligand KIR2DL4 by Human Peripheral Blood Leucocyte Subsets

Abstract: HLA-G is a non-classical class I HLA antigen, normally expressed in high levels only on extravillous cytotrophoblast. It has immunosuppressive properties in pregnancy and has also been found to be upregulated on leucocytes in viral infection. In this study, proportions of all leucocyte subsets expressing HLA-G were found to be low in healthy subjects positive or negative for cytomegalovirus (CMV). Significantly greater proportions of CD4+ CD69+ and CD56+ T cells expressed HLA-G compared to other T cells. Howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A proportion of the HLA-G+ CD4+ T cells, particularly of the CD69+ subset, may have been Tregs and it has been suggested that sHLA-G may participate in graft acceptance through induction of Tregs [39]. In our previous work with healthy subjects, only around 1-2% of Tregs expressed HLA-G and this proportion was decreased further following stimulation with CMV antigens [36]. Alternative possibilities are that HLA-G+ CD4+ T cells are a component of the alloreactive population or are induced following immunosuppressive drug treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A proportion of the HLA-G+ CD4+ T cells, particularly of the CD69+ subset, may have been Tregs and it has been suggested that sHLA-G may participate in graft acceptance through induction of Tregs [39]. In our previous work with healthy subjects, only around 1-2% of Tregs expressed HLA-G and this proportion was decreased further following stimulation with CMV antigens [36]. Alternative possibilities are that HLA-G+ CD4+ T cells are a component of the alloreactive population or are induced following immunosuppressive drug treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Such changes in HLA-G expression may potentially also be related to the immunosuppressive drug treatment or other factors, such as activation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). In previous work in healthy subjects we have shown that stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with CMV antigens resulted in increased proportions of leucocytes expressing HLA-G, particularly B cells and CD56+ T cells [36]. The aims of the present experiments were to assess any post-transplant changes in HLA-G expression by a range of leucocyte subsets in renal transplant patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Besides, NK cells express the KIR2DL4 receptor, another putative HLA‐G receptor. Notwithstanding, the binding of sHLA‐G to KIR2DL4 does not affect NK cytotoxicity …”
Section: The Effect Of Hla‐g On Cells Of the Innate And Adaptive Immumentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notwithstanding, the binding of sHLA-G to KIR2DL4 does not affect NK cytotoxicity. 63 Although the expression of ILT2 in B-cells has long been reported, the function of HLA-G on B cells has recently been investigated. HLA-G inhibits the proliferation, differentiation and antibody secretion of activated B cells from peripheral blood and secondary lymphoid organs through interaction with ILT2.…”
Section: The Effect Of Hla-g On Cells Of the Innate And Adaptive Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LILRB1 is not conserved between humans and the common chimpanzee, KIR2DL4 is highly conserved, a striking observation considering the rapid evolution of the KIR locus . HLA‐G can be up‐regulated during viral infections such as CMV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV . This raises the intriguing possibility that the HLA‐G–KIR2DL4 interaction may have an important biological role that has led to their conservation between humans and chimpanzees.…”
Section: Differential Roles Of Polymorphic and Non‐polymorphic Receptmentioning
confidence: 99%